USFS Reorganization Hold (PDF)

READ FULL STORY

The federal judge is requiring the U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to notify all employees of the order within two days, and also post it to the Forest Service’s reorganization website. Within seven business days, the Trump administration must file a declaration verifying that they have complied with the order that outlines the steps they’re taking. Tom Schultz on the Reorganization

Beavers-Hype or Hero

READ NEWSLETTER

The Maroon Bells

READ FULL STORY

Public Lands -Interior Secretary has let down public land and the nation

2026-09-03 GBR Presentation
Greater Boise Recreation meeting notes for September 3 2026


The Teton mountains reflect on Oxbow Bend in Grand Teton National Park in Moran

10. September 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Centennial Trail route change considered · Categories: Around The Campfire, Public Lands

The Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Board is seeking to change a section of the Idaho Centennial Trail’s official route to improve hikers’ safety and avoid a dangerous creek crossing, state officials announced Sept. 3.

The Idaho Centennial Trail, or ICT for short, is a more than 900-mile trail that crosses the entire state of Idaho, from the desert at the Idaho-Nevada border, all the way up to the Canadian border. Along the route, the trail passes through some of the most wild, scenic and remote places in Idaho, including the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness, the Sawtooth Wilderness and the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness.

Although a few people complete the Idaho Centennial Trail as a thru-hike in a single, months-long push, the trail is broken up into segments and utilizes other, existing trails to allow different users the opportunity to enjoy smaller sections of the trail without having to navigate the entire trail.

The new route change involves adding about nine miles to the Idaho Centennial Trail to avoid an unabridged crossing of Big Creek in the Salmon-Challis National Forest.

Rather than forcing hikers and backpackers to ford Big Creek, the new route will follow Milk Creek Trail 064 and Monumental Creek Trail 005 to allow hikers to safely cross Big Creek at a bridge near the junction with Monumental Creek, Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation officials said. “A longer trail isn’t always a better trail, but in this case, the additional miles provide a significant safety benefit,” Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Director Susan Buxton said in a written statement. “By routing the Idaho Centennial Trail across an existing bridge, we can help ensure that more people can experience this incredible section of the ICT without having to take on a potentially dangerous creek crossing.”

The official route for the Idaho Continental Trail was approved in 1990 by the Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Board, which has the authority to change routes on the trail in partnership with land managers and the public.

Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation officials said their counterparts with the Salmon-Challis National Forest support the change, and they are opening a 30-day public comment period about the route change.

To offer public comment, send an email to Hailey Husband, the Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation’s nonmotorized trails coordinator, at hailey.husband@idpr.idaho.gov or call 208-514-2419.

05. September 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Forest Corps – WY · Categories: Around The Campfire, Public Lands

When trails snaking through Wyoming’s 9 million acres of national forests go unmaintained or unused, nature can begin to reclaim them with remarkable speed.

Look no further than sections of the Wyoming National Recreation Trail in the Bridger-Teton National Forest’s Big Piney District, where the path had become barely discernable under a mat of scrubby grasses.

“It’s just been overgrown for years,” said former U.S. Forest Service employee Monica Elliott.

It was there that Wyoming’s newest trails crew, the Forest Corps — which Elliott manages — landed in July for a work hitch to assist the district recreation staff. After eight days of digging, clearing and delineating, voilá. The trail boasted the shiny new-dirt look of a just-constructed path.

It was among the 2026 projects undertaken by the Forest Corps. The nonprofit Friends of the Bridger-Teton created the Forest Corps in 2025 after seeing U.S. Forest Service district offices hollowed out by DOGE cuts and facing mounting maintenance backlogs.

The Corps was designed explicitly to help the agency on summer-season field projects in the Bridger-Teton National Forest, one of eight national forests within Wyoming’s borders. Friends of the Bridger-Teton hired former U.S. Forest Service staff, including Elliott, who had lost her job in the cuts, for the Corps.

In its inaugural season, the team communicated with each of the Bridger-Teton forest’s six districts to identify a high-impact project to assist on. The Corps painted picnic tables, installed a puncheon trail over marshy terrain and cleared trails in wildfire burn areas.

Once the demand for such an auxiliary crew became clear to the Friends nonprofit, which works to assist its namesake national forest in managing visitor impacts, the organization decided to make the initiative permanent.

Even with the Forest Service rehiring many of its seasonal recreation workers in 2026, Elliott said, “there is so much need” when it comes to maintaining the inventory of trails and infrastructure on the 3.4-million-acre Bridger-Teton National Forest.

This summer, the crew has worked six hitches lasting eight days and a couple lasting four. Along with projects like the Big Piney region trail, Elliott and the four-person team have cleared 700 downed trees from 80 miles of trail across the forest, including the Pack Creek Fire burn area.

The season’s not over yet; the Forest Corps still has two hitches to go.

05. September 2026 · Comments Off on USFS Releases some of it restructuring plan · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

After months of uncertainty, researchers with the U.S. Forest Service are learning whether they will have to relocate under the agency’s sweeping restructure.

The U.S. Forest Service announced the plan to restructure in March, when it said it was evaluating more than 50 research and development facilities for potential closure. Today, it announced it will shutter nearly two dozen facilities.

In the Pacific Northwest, at least three locations were being evaluated for closure, of those three, one will be closed: The Pacific Northwest regional headquarters in Portland.

When the plan was first released, researchers were concerned about the potential closure of labs in Seattle and Wenatchee. The Seattle smoke lab forecasts where wildfire smoke is expected to drift and how it could impact human health. Research out of Wenatchee has informed more than a decade of forest management policy.

“The people in charge again have shown that they act without comprehension of the consequences,” University of Washington fire ecologist Don McKenzie said by email.

McKenzie retired from the U.S. Forest Service after researching wildfires and climate change at the agency’s Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory in Seattle.

When the list of facilities being evaluated for closure was first released, the agency received a lot of pushback from the public as well as from members of congress. McKenzie said he believes the advocacy for science made a difference in the Forest Service’s reduced closure plan.

Chris French, associate chief of the U.S. Forest Service, said in an earlier interview with the Northwest News Network that the restructure would not affect ongoing research.

He said the agency is spending more on leases and building costs than it receives from congress and that it tried to close facilities where there were fewer employees, or where employees could commute to a less expensive office.

“Our lease that we have for our regional office in Portland and for the Pacific Northwest Research Station is a relatively expensive lease,” French said. “We have basically negotiated other spaces for our employees within the local commuting area, that will cut those costs by two thirds.”

The U.S. Forest Service defines commuting distance as 49 miles. If a commute exceeds that amount, the agency could need to pay its employees relocation costs.

Under the new plan, some of those currently working out of Portland will be commuting to a new state office in Salem, about 47 miles away.

“That is quite a commute for some folks if they were working in downtown Portland,” French said. “But it does keep them from having to move their families.”

Moving the Portland regional headquarters to Salem is part of the agency’s national plan of dissolving all regional offices in favor of state offices. It is also moving its headquarters from Washington D.C. to Salt Lake City.

Kevin Hood, executive director for Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, said the non-profit worries about the plan to dissolve regional headquarters. The conservation advocacy organization was founded in 1989 by former forest service employees concerned about land management practices.

“The chief has described the new state director positions in these state offices as being policy responsive to state governors and state foresters, and the concern there is that the national forests belong to the American people and they’re governed by federal law that’s been passed by Congress.”

Hood worked for the U.S. Forest Service for decades before deciding to leave his role in 2025. He said discussion about restructuring the forest service to save funds started under previous administrations, but the Trump administration’s approach has been chaotic.

In 2025, as the administration’s Department of Government Efficiency laid off federal employees and offered early retirement incentives and buyouts, the forest service lost about 16% of its workforce during that time. Hood said remaining forest service employees have been fearful that the restructure could result in losing their jobs, or having to relocate.

“The employees that I’ve been talking to, they often say they have more questions than answers, and that they have a bit of a skepticism that any direction that comes out is actually going to endure because there’s been so much change and turmoil,” he said.

In a press release about the reorganization plan, the U.S. Forest Service said the consolidation of the facilities recently announced will save the agency more than $16 million. It also said the agency isn’t finished evaluating facilities for possible closure.

This story comes to you from the Northwest News Network, a collaboration between public media organizations in Oregon and Washington.

KUOW’s John Ryan contributed to this report.

03. September 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Stibnite Mine Battle Update · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

The federal approval allowing a gold and antimony mine in eastern Valley County was upheld last month in United States District Court.

An Aug. 18 ruling by Judge Amanda K. Brailsford affirms the Payette National Forest’s January 2025 approval of Perpetua Resources’ Stibnite mine near Yellow Pine.

The lawsuit raised eight claims arguing that the Payette N.F. and other federal agencies violated environmental law in approving the mine. Brailsford, however, ruled in favor of the federal agencies on nearly all of the claims.

“The court concludes that the defendants’ approval of the project did not violate the applicable environmental laws – with one exception,” she wrote in her decision.

The exception relates to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s analysis of the mine’s impact on bull trout and wolverines, both of which are classified as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act.

Brailsford found that the agency’s “incidental take statements” for the two species did not adequately specify monitoring requirements and measures to limit the mine’s impacts.

An incidental take statement is issued when a federal agency determines that an approved action may inadvertently harm protected wildlife. FWS’s statements were deficient because they relied on cross-referencing other documents rather than including required protections in the statements, Brailsford said.

“That defendants can identify statements in the record that might support or flesh out the incidental take statement’s reasonable and prudent measures and terms and conditions does not satisfy FWS’s mandatory duty,” she said.

Brailsford ordered FWS to issue amended incidental take statements for wolverines and bull trout, but did not vacate the agency’s decision or any of the other federal approvals for the mine.

Conservation groups appeal, cite ‘unacceptable risks’

Conservation groups that filed the lawsuit appealed Brailsford’s ruling on Aug. 25, continuing their bid to overturn the federal approval and halt Perpetua’s construction of the mine.

“We believe this appeal is essential to prevent long-term damage to this cherished part of Idaho,” said Sydney Luvaas, mining and policy manager for Idaho Rivers United. “The stakes for local water quality, wildlife, and surrounding public lands are simply too high to ignore.”

Save the South Fork Salmon, the Idaho Conservation League, Earthworks, and the Center for Biological Diversity are also plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

Bryan Hurlbutt, an environmental attorney representing the groups, said they are pleased the court ordered additional protections for wolverines and bull trout, but still hope construction will be stopped on appeal.

“Allowing initial mine construction to proceed presents unacceptable risks to the South Fork Salmon River watershed, our public national forest lands, and the fish and wildlife that live there,” Hurlbutt said.

In May, Brailsford denied a motion by the environmental groups to stop Perpetua from starting construction until the lawsuit is resolved, as Valley Lookout reported.

Perpetua President Jon Cherry framed the ruling as a win for the company and described the changes ordered by Brailsford as a “narrow, discrete issue.”

“Overall, the court rejected the plaintiffs’ requests to restrict Perpetua’s construction and operation of the Stibnite Gold Project,” Cherry said. “The court’s remand was limited and does not require reconsideration of the agency’s decision.”

Other legal battles

Two other lawsuits challenging permitting for the Stibnite mine remain active.

A lawsuit filed by the Nez Perce Tribe last August is also pending before Brailsford. That lawsuit also challenges the federal approvals for the mine and seeks to halt its implementation.

Meanwhile, a lawsuit challenging an air quality permit issued to Perpetua by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality could be headed to the Idaho Supreme Court.

In July, Fourth Judicial District Judge Jason Scott ruled in favor of DEQ, prompting an Aug. 18 appeal filed by the Idaho Conservation League and Save the South Fork Salmon.

However, that appeal was temporarily suspended on Aug. 31 due to lack of payment for court transcripts, according to online court records.

Perpetua is currently in the first year of a three-year, $2.6 billion construction phase to build the Stibnite mine. Work this year is focused primarily on power line upgrades, improved road access, and workforce housing at the mine site.

“We continue to see tangible progress at Stibnite,” Cherry said.

Once construction is complete, Perpetua expects mining operations to last for 12 to 15 years, under the mining plan currently approved by regulators.

The mining timeline could be extended if exploration currently underway yields promising results, as Valley Lookout reported.

The Stibnite mine is expected to produce 4.2 million ounces of gold and 115 million pounds of antimony, according to Perpetua. The metals would be extracted from three open-pit mines totaling about 473 acres within the 1,740-acre project zone, which is about 40 air miles east of McCall and three miles from the Frank Church – River of No Return Wilderness.

Opponents of the mine fear it could pollute the East Fork South Fork Salmon River, which flows through the project site, and cause other environmental damage.

Water quality in the East Fork and other streams at the proposed mine site does not currently meet federal drinking water standards due to high concentrations of arsenic and antimony from pollutants left by previous mining companies.

READ MORE

02. September 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – USFS Roadless Rule – Repeal Info · Categories: Around The Campfire, BCHI /BCHA, Current Events, Public Lands

Roadless-Rule-condensed_Mack Long

USFS information Sheet 0826 rule changes Wyoming 2.0

Roadless Rule and BCH


FS-2025-0001-224064_content  (Full Document  48 Pages)

30. August 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – State and Federal Recreation Access Agreement · Categories: Around The Campfire, Current Events, Public Lands

BOISE, Idaho — Outdoor recreation in Idaho is set for an improvement, according to an expanded partnership between state and federal agencies.

The Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation and the U.S. Forest Service announced that they are expanding their partnership through two Good Neighbor Authority recreation agreements that will “improve trails, restore access to public lands and enhance outdoor recreation opportunities across Idaho.”

The first recreation agreement covers the Idaho Panhandle and Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests, utilizing the EXPLORE Act’s Good Neighbor Authority recreation pilot.

This first-of-its-kind agreement will provide “approximately $166,000 for recreation improvements, including maintenance of 115 miles of non-motorized trails and new or upgraded signage across 1,200 miles of winter recreation trails throughout North Idaho.”

The second agreement includes the Salmon-Challis National Forest and intends to improve recreation access for Idahoans within the Frank Church Wilderness and its surrounding areas.

According to this agreement, “IDPR will assist with clearing downed trees and other obstacles from portions of 542 miles of trail impacted by wildfire, insects, and disease, while also supporting construction of a motorized trail that restores public access to a significant area of Idaho’s backcountry.”

“These agreements represent the future of public land stewardship in Idaho,” said Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Director Susan Buxton in a news release. “By partnering with the U.S. Forest Service through the Good Neighbor Authority, we’re protecting some of Idaho’s most treasured landscapes while making them more accessible for residents and visitors alike. Together, we’re ensuring our trails and recreation opportunities remain safe, sustainable and enjoyable for generations to come.”

Both agreements build upon the EXPLORE Act of 2025, which paved the way for state and federal agencies to work together on recreation projects that improve public access and stewardship of National Forest lands.

“The Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests and Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation have a long-standing history of working together to improve and maintain recreational access and opportunities,” said Forest Supervisor for the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests Jon Word. “Expanding this partnership through Good Neighbor Authority leverages our shared resources across boundaries, benefiting the public and the places we love to recreate.”

For those who enjoy the great outdoors, it seems this latest collaborative effort will expand and preserve opportunities in the wild for Idahoans to partake in.
24. August 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Revisions to the old Forest Service Travel Management plan · Categories: Around The Campfire, Current Events, Public Lands

READ MORE

LINK TO THIS PODCAST

05. August 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – onX Comment Hub on Public Land Legislation · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

In an effort to bring more voices to bear on public lands issues, onX unveiled the Public Land Comment Hub today. This interactive map shows current proposals, color-coded by land management agency — U.S. Forest Service (green), National Park Service (pink), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (blue), and Bureau of Land Management (yellow). Users can click any shaded area to learn more about the issue, see how many days remain in the comment period, and immediately connect to the agency website to add their comment. The page also has resources on how to craft a good comment and a helpful acronym glossary to decode some of the bureaucracy.

30. July 2026 · Comments Off on Wilderness – Be able to use chainsaws (Yes/No) · Categories: Around The Campfire, Public Lands

Ban on chainsaws in wilderness

 

 

20. July 2026 · Comments Off on ITA – Chainsaws in the Wilderness (Frank Church) · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

In May of this year, the Salmon-Challis National Forest (SCNF) authorized limited use of gas-powered chainsaws to clear 542 miles of specifically designated trails in the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness. Use is limited to the next three years, starting this summer, from January 1 to August 1 of each year, and is limited to users approved by the Forest Service. This work was authorized through a document called the Minimum Requirements Analysis, which you can read about here. Right now, this work is mainly being done by permitted outfitters operating on the Forest.

As a boots-on-the-ground, volunteer-based organization, ITA’s primary focus is on getting trail maintenance done on the ground. When we learned of the chainsaw authorization, our first thought was of our twelve planned projects on the Salmon-Challis National Forest in 2026, and which trails approved for chainsaw use overlapped with our schedule.

This means we need to coordinate closely with outfitters to ensure we know where they are operating saws. Our number one priority is well-organized projects with meaningful, safe, and fun work for volunteers, work that contributes to making trails more accessible for the public. It’s more important than ever to communicate with both SCNF personnel and outfitters as we tackle the projects planned in that area this year. ITA will continue to use non-motorized/non-mechanized tools to accomplish this work in designated wilderness areas.

ITA is focusing on being proactive and communicating up front with the Forest Service and outfitters. Where a trail is planned for clearing by chainsaw, as was the recent case with the Marsh Creek Trail, ITA will assess the site to determine if it is still suitable for a good volunteer project. In the case of our recent Marsh Creek project, the answer was “yes”. The Forest Service trail program lead met our crew on the trail for a weekend of removing large boulders and root wads, brushing and improving tread, all work vital to keeping this trail navigable. We will follow this process for future projects and determine if the work remaining is meaningful and suited to volunteers or if the project is best moved somewhere else.

In the short term, as trail season winds down and after hunting season is over and outfitters are out of the backcountry, we plan to participate in Forest Service and partner meetings to review the first year of this program and identify successes, ask questions, raise concerns and discuss challenges and opportunities to improve coordination between partners and the FS and implementation of the MRA itself with its present requirements and allowances.

Over the longer term- the next three years- ITA will advocate for a long-term solution that recommits to the use of traditional tools as the way to keep trails open in the wilderness.

We will urge Congress to pass adequate funding for both Forest Service staff and partners. The Forest Service needs to restore the right positions in the right places to coordinate and support work by partners like ITA, conservation corps, and outfitters working in their respective areas.

Paid, full-season trail crews are needed. The public land trail system is a national treasure, with tremendous recreational value in today’s times. Recreational value translates to economic value for communities as well. We need trail crews to do all the work – cutting, brushing, tread work, bridges. ITA has proved people value trails; our volunteers worked 16,614 hours on trails in 2025. We are able and willing to learn the wilderness skills to maintain trails. But at the core, we need full-time, skilled Forest Service crews with years of experience to fully utilize volunteers and fully support less experienced paid crews. Over the long term, we need crews on horses and mules or with backpacks, carrying axes and crosscut saws – not chainsaws.

This decision has sparked intense debate. We feel use of mechanized equipment should be the exception to standard wilderness tools and should only be used in emergency situations. Yet, while we look ahead to a future where trails can be maintained using traditional tools, we also must focus on a present where there are hundreds of miles of trails in desperate need of work, from log out to tread repair. We must focus on our role as an on-the-ground organization, dedicated to working with other partners and the Forest Service to get vital work done this season. We care deeply about wilderness and about the traditional tools and skills that have been part of maintaining backcountry trails for decades, and we value our relationships with partners because this will always be a team effort. We will continue to speak for wilderness values while maintaining relationships with our partners, for the good of trails.

Sincerely,  Melanie Vining, ITA Executive Director

16. July 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Federal Land Management Survey – Idaho · Categories: Public Lands

Federal Land Management Survey

 

15. July 2026 · Comments Off on Volunteers – Trail Celebration Day · Categories: Around The Campfire, Public Lands

09. July 2026 · Comments Off on Recreation Tracking on Public Lands · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

Federal land agencies want to know how many people are hiking, camping and sightseeing on public lands — and are testing dozens of pilot projects to get better data.

Traditional methods for tracking recreation numbers include trailhead surveys or vehicle counters. But those techniques don’t capture all visitors, especially in less popular areas.

Last year, Congress passed the EXPLORE Act, a package of measures to boost outdoor recreation access as record numbers participate in outdoor activities. It also directed agencies to study new visitation monitoring methods.

Federal agencies including the Interior Department followed up in late June by announcing dozens of pilot projects to evaluate some of the latest techniques. Some are new projects, while others are studies that have already been completed.

Many of the newer methods fall under the category of “digital mobility data,” said Spencer Wood, who directs the Outdoor Recreation and Data Lab at the University of Washington.

Several of Wood’s studies were included in the list of federal pilot projects, such as ones that analyze aggregated call phone data and public social media.

“They post a photograph that says they are having a great time mountain biking – that’s useful information,” he said. “We can observe that by looking at the content of images that people share publicly on social media platforms, or we can understand people’s activities by looking at the way they write a trip report.”

Another option that Wood has studied involves tracking how many people participate in virtual citizen science projects on public lands. Federal agencies say these innovative approaches are promising but need more studying.

Examples of projects to study outdoor recreation visitation:

  • Bryce Canyon National Park (Utah): Researchers from Pennsylvania State University will use cellphone location data to estimate visitor patterns at Bryce Canyon National Park. They will compare it with data collected in the field to estimate the relationship between park entrance numbers and visits to specific sites.
  • Forest Service visitor surveys: The Forest Service will analyze visitor surveys to better understand recreation that isn’t well monitored, including backcountry skiing, snowmobiling and rock climbing.
  • Salmon River (Idaho): A previous study along the Salmon River used game cameras to count boats and people floating the river, along with automatic counters to track vehicles heading to the river.

Wood said analyzing all the projects could help inform federal land management decisions.

“That might involve questions about what type of infrastructure do they build, where do they improve roads, or where might they improve parking, or where might they work on trail development?”

The federal government is accepting public comments on the pilot projects through July 29.

This story was produced by the Mountain West News Bureau, a collaboration between Wyoming Public Media, Nevada Public Radio, Boise State Public Radio in Idaho, KUNR in Nevada, KUNC in Colorado and KANW in New Mexico, with support from affiliate stations across the region. Funding for the Mountain West News Bureau is provided in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting

02. June 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – President signed an executive order that could fundamentally change public lands · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

This came from Backcountry Hunters and Anglers.

Friday night, the President signed an executive order that could fundamentally change public lands as we know them.

Decades of underlying policy allowing agencies to govern motorized vehicle use on federal land? Gone. Agencies have been directed to rescind or rewrite policy that has regulated ORV use on public lands for the past 50 years.

We, the BHA community, already know the implications: Unchecked motorized travel on public lands can harm access for everyone in the long run. It changes wildlife behavior, fragments habitat & trades the quiet for the noise.

Access matters & we fight for it every day. But access & motorization are NOT the same thing.
Not every acre of public land should be managed for maximum motorized access. The ability to reach public lands should not come at the expense of the wild qualities that make those places worth visiting in the first place.

We’re dissecting every detail of this order and continuing to advocate for the backcountry in the halls of Congress. More to come.
~~

The draft is to not allow any restrictions on motorized access to national forests, you can’t tell a motorcyclist they can’t ride there or stop ATV or UTV access to anywhere.  They want to “open and improve” airstrips in the backcountry, the Big Creek 4 are right there on top of the list.  They want to rewrite the wilderness act to allow chainsaws across the board, which opens the door for mechanized travel and motorized travel in Wilderness.  That chainsaws in Wilderness push was just the foot in the door for eliminating what we know as big W Wilderness.  Trump is piling this on faster than we can fight it.  I am still involved in fighting the chainsaw thing and a lawsuit is being drafted, those folks that are OK with using chainsaws have just opened the door for the full on removal (or updating as IOGA calls it) of the Wilderness Act. Jeff Halligan

01. June 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Repeal of Travel Management · Categories: Around The Campfire, Current Events, Public Lands

May 29, 2026 – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SUWA Statement on President Trump’s Repeal of Travel Management Executive Orders – 5.29.26

Will bring unregulated motorized recreation and chaos across public lands  

Contacts:
Grant Stevens, Communications Director, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA); (319) 427-0260; grant@suwa.org

Washington, DC – Friday evening, in his latest attack on federal public lands, President Trump announced the repeal of Executive Order 11644 of February 8, 1972 (Use of Off-Road Vehicles on the Public Lands), and Executive Order 11989 of May 24, 1977 (Off-Road Vehicles on Public Lands). He further directed federal land management agencies including the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service to rescind or revise their regulations implementing these Orders. Below is a statement from SUWA Legal Director Steve Bloch and additional information.

“The reality is that there are tens of thousands of miles of dirt roads and trails in Utah’s canyon country open today to motorized vehicles. Far from motorized vehicles being kept out of public lands, it’s quite the opposite: it’s the wildlife and visitors trying to picnic or camp with their families that are being chased out at every turn,” said Steve Bloch, Legal Director at the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA). “These executive orders provided the foundation for common-sense management of motorized vehicles on public lands. They recognized the destructive impact unmanaged motor vehicles have on our public lands and required federal agencies to minimize the damage. The impacts of today’s Order will be significant, long-lasting, and devastating.”

About Executive Orders 11644 and 11989

Presidents Nixon and Carter issued Executive Orders 11644 and 11989 in 1972 and 1977, respectively, in response to the growing use of dirt bikes, snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, and other off-road vehicles (ORVs) and corresponding environmental damage and conflicts with non-motorized recreationists. These executive orders require federal land managers to plan for ORV use to protect resources and other recreational uses. Specifically, the executive orders require that, when designating areas or trails available for ORV use, the agencies locate them to:

(1) minimize damage to soil, watershed, vegetation, and other resources of the public lands;

(2) minimize harassment of wildlife or significant disruption of wildlife habitats; and

(3) minimize conflicts between off-road vehicle use and other existing or proposed recreational uses of the same or neighboring public lands.

SUWA Statement on President Trump’s Repeal of Travel Management Executive Orders – 5.29.26 

29. May 2026 · Comments Off on May 2026 Sawtooth National Forest Update · Categories: Around The Campfire, Current Events, Public Lands

New Communication Tools in Play

The Sawtooth National Forest will be implementing a couple new communication tools to keep stakeholders informed about what’s happening on the Forest now and what’s on our horizon.

New Subscription Email Distribution System

We are so excited to be sharing this email through a new subscription email distribution system. Aside from being able to share what’s happening on the forest with stakeholders directly, the best part of this system is that stakeholders control whether or not they continue to receive these updates. Subscription and personal profiles can be managed in the footer of this email.

New users can subscribe for these updates themselves on our Keep in Touch webpage. We do want to warn those who choose to share these emails with others that each distributed email is tied directly to a specific email and profile. So, if you share the email with someone who doesn’t want to continue receiving updates, they may unintentionally unsubscribe you from our lists thinking they are doing it for themselves. To avoid this confusion, we will, as much as possible, put the bulk of the the content we want to share on our website so you can alternatively share the website addresses to the main content.

READ NEWSLETTER

27. May 2026 · Comments Off on Public lands – Trailhead Update SBFC · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

Over the past few weeks, we’ve been bombarded with questions about SBFC’s position on the recent signing of the Minimum Requirements Analysis for chainsaw use on certain trails in the Frank Church- River of No Return Wilderness.

SBFC is a wilderness stewardship organization with “Frank Church” in our name, so people naturally want to know our stance and what “side” we are on. The us-vs.-them narrative on this subject, and so many others in our country, can be incredibly strong.

SBFC has never been about us vs. them. We are a non-advocacy, boots-on-the-ground stewardship organization. We recruit hundreds of volunteers and hire dozens of seasonal staff and interns each year to get an incredible amount of work done in the Selway-Bitterroot, Frank Church, and surrounding wildlands. One of our strengths is that we won’t play into the us-versus-them narrative. It’s not what we do.

But, for those wondering, what is SBFC’s position on this “in the news” topic? Here it is:  SBFC is a wilderness stewardship outfit. We do a ton of work on trails. We estimate that SBFC crews will maintain 600-1000 miles of trail under our current plans this season. It’s a tremendous amount of work.

SBFC crews will use traditional tools while working in the wilderness this season, just as we have for the last twenty years. Our crews are experienced and skilled with crosscuts and axes, and they’ll remove 5,000-10,000+ logs from the trail corridor this season with those tools, skills, and passion.

SBFC wilderness trail crews do more than just remove logs. We forecast that our crews will likely spend 30-40% of their time cutting logs this season. Tread repair and drainage work has become an increasingly large part of what our crews do. This work is not optional; it truly sustains the resource. Brushing (no one’s favorite job) is equally important for the long-term sustainability of the trail. You can be sure we’ll be doing a whole lot of this work, in addition to cutting out thousands of logs.

All of this is to say, SBFC is laser-focused on wilderness stewardship. For us, wilderness stewardship means we’ll be using traditional non-motorized / non-mechanized tools when working in the wilderness, whether removing logs from the 8 ft wide trail corridor, removing brush, kicking rocks off the tread, or repairing the tread itself, which is a highly technical, skilled task where there are no shortcuts to doing good work.

No matter the tool or task, it takes an incredible amount of human time, effort, and skill to accomplish wilderness and trail stewardship goals across this landscape. It takes more humans than we have had out there in recent years (or decades). So, we will focus on bringing more humans into the fold and out on the ground. In 2026, we have our largest ever cohort of seasonal staff and interns (34!), and not by a small margin. We’ll engage with the most adult and youth volunteers in our history, and again, not by a small margin. We can see the energy, the excitement, and the momentum. It is real. Those are the things that we need, and those are the things that stand the test of time as we look ahead, not just for the next few years, but for decades to come.

SBFC exists because people love wilderness, and people care about these places a whole lot. We can say with confidence that many people will continue to love and care about these places far into the future.

Our mission is to open pathways for all to discover and steward wilderness. Stewarding wilderness is hard. It’s especially hard in the largest wilderness in the lower 48. What a privilege it is to play our role in this endeavor and to do it well. You can find us out there this season, from Missoula to Boise, and all points between, working to keep the wildest place accessible.

As always, feel free to reach out with thoughts, questions, or comments!

Wilderness Forever & For Everyone,

22. May 2026 · Comments Off on Education: Why Norovirus is a perennial Problem · Categories: Education, Public Lands, Safety

READ MORE

21. May 2026 · Comments Off on Forest Service OKs chainsaws to clear trails in one of the largest wilderness areas · Categories: Around The Campfire, Current Events, Public Lands

https://www.aspenpublicradio.org/2026-05-14/forest-service-oks-chainsaws-to-clear-trails-in-one-of-the-largest-wilderness-areas

The U.S. Forest Service has granted a rare exemption allowing the use of chainsaws in one of the country’s largest wilderness areas.

The agency on Wednesday approved a request from the Idaho Outfitters and Guides Association to temporarily use gas-powered chainsaws to clear about 542 miles of trails in the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness, citing “extraordinary levels” of downed trees. The Frank Church, in central Idaho, is the largest contiguous wilderness area in the lower 48 states.

“This action is necessary to restore safe public access while minimizing impacts to wilderness character and remaining fully compliant with the Wilderness Act of 1964,” Amy Baumer, a spokesperson for the Salmon-Challis National Forest, wrote in an email.

Trees blocking trails

Trail crews typically rely on hand tools such as crosscut saws in designated wilderness areas, which are among the most protected public lands. The Wilderness Act prohibits motorized vehicles and equipment to protect places “untrammeled by man” and to preserve “solitude.”

These exclusions have long been interpreted to include chainsaws, though the Forest Service grants occasional exceptions, usually after wildfires or major storms.

But the Idaho Outfitters and Guides Association (IOGA) petitioned the agency last year, arguing that decades of wildfire and disease have created an unmanageable buildup of fallen trees. A Forest Service survey last year estimated between 80,000 and 110,000 trees lying along one 150-mile stretch in the Frank Church.

“Almost half the trails in this wilderness area on the Salmon-Challis are unusable,” said Erik Weiseth, the executive director of IOGA. “Over time, they will just be overgrown and disappear. That is not only hurting our outfitter members, but it’s also hurting the general public. It’s hurting their ability to access the wilderness.”

Weiseth said the blockages have meant lost business for outfitters who can’t get to the spots where they’re authorized to run hunting or guided horseback trips. Volunteers and a shrinking Forest Service workforce have struggled to keep trails open with hand tools, he said. He also pointed to language in the law specific to the Frank Church wilderness, which directs the agency to clear trails annually “to the maximum extent practicable.”

What’s allowed in wilderness?

In a letter on Wednesday, the nonprofit Wilderness Watch asked the Forest Service to delay implementation until 2027 to allow time for judicial review “before the wilderness is overrun with chainsaws.”

George Nickas, the executive director of the Missoula-based organization, called the authorization “just blatantly illegal” and said the organization is considering legal action.

“Getting in there with chainsaws to clear all these trails – it’s all about domination. It’s all about our controlling what’s going on there, our wanting to change the character of the wilderness to meet our demands,” he said. “That’s just the antithesis of what the Wilderness Act is all about.”

The group said it learned of discussions between IOGA and Forest Service officials, including Chief Tom Schultz who is from Idaho, through public records requests. It criticized the agency for not allowing public comment before the approval.

Nickas said the decision could have implications beyond Idaho. Public records reviewed by the group indicated outfitters in Wyoming asked the agency to allow battery-operated chainsaws for trail maintenance.

In 2019, the Forest Service approved chainsaw use in two wilderness areas in Colorado. Conservation groups including Wilderness Watch sued, and the agency later withdrew the proposal.

Two people use a crosscut saw to cut a fallen tree in the forest.
U.S. Forest Service
A trail crews uses a crosscut saw to cut a fallen tree in the Gila National Forest in New Mexico.

The authorization by the Forest Service in the Frank Church allows licensed outfitters to use chainsaws for three years from Jan. 1 through Aug. 1 each year.

Weiseth said that by Wednesday afternoon, authorized outfitters were already in the forest clearing logs.

“This is a big deal to these guys. They’ve been wanting to get some of these trails open for a decade or more,” he said. “They threw their stuff in the truck and started driving to the woods, ready to go.”

This story was produced by the Mountain West News Bureau, a collaboration between Wyoming Public Media, Nevada Public Radio, Boise State Public Radio in Idaho, KUNR in Nevada, KUNC in Northern Colorado, KANW in New Mexico, Colorado Public Radio, KJZZ in Arizona and NPR, with additional support from affiliate newsrooms across the region. Funding for the Mountain West News Bureau is provided in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and Eric and Wendy Schmidt.

23. April 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – USFS Restructure Concerns · Categories: Around The Campfire, Current Events, Public Lands


The recently announced major restructure of the U.S. Forest Service may disrupt a number of forestry positions in Idaho. But the details as to how those positions will be affected and what work will continue or be eliminated under the plan remain unclear.

Anna Webb, an entomologist and federal employee union representative based in Boise, received a notice about two weeks ago that her position in the agency would be affected. The letter said affected employees may have to move, find another position within the federal agency, or resign.

There was no expected timeline to the changes.

“It makes things difficult to plan,” Webb said, speaking to the Idaho Capital Sun in her capacity as a union representative. “It causes unprecedented amounts of stress.”

Leaders of the federal employee union that represents Forest Service employees for the Boise, Payette, Salmon-Challis and Sawtooth national forests are concerned about the disruption to local employees as well as the potential long-term consequences to forest health.  READ MORE: 2026-04-22 USFS Restructure

07. April 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Western Snow Pack 2026 · Categories: Around The Campfire, Public Lands

Snow surveys taking place across the American west this week are offering a grim prognosis, after a historically warm winter and searing March temperatures left the critical snowpack at record-low levels across the region.

Experts warned that even as the heat begins to subside, the stunning pace of melt-off over the past month has left key basins in uncharted territory for the dry seasons ahead. Though there’s still potential for more snow in the forecast, experts said it will probably be too little too late.

“This year is on a whole other level,” said Dr Russ Schumacher, a Colorado State University climatologist, speaking about the intense heat that began rapidly melting the already sparse snowpack in March. “Seeing this year so far below any of the other years we have data for is very concerning.”

Acting as a water savings account of sorts, snowpacks are essential to water supply. Measurements taken across the west during the week of 1 April are viewed as important indicators of the peak amounts of water that might melt into reservoirs, rivers and streams and across thirsty landscapes through the summer.  READ MORE

02. April 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Owyhee Canyon Lands · Categories: Around The Campfire, Public Lands

For many travelers, a summer adventure means photographing or traversing some of Mother Nature’s incredible works of art. Unfortunately, many of the iconic National Parks are so crowded that they require reservations in advance. If you’re looking for challenging hikes, excellent fishing, breathtaking canyon views, and epic whitewater without the crowds, consider the spectacular Owyhee Canyonlands, locally known as “The Big Quiet.” This largely untouched area covers nearly 9 million acres of Eastern Oregon, Southwestern Idaho, and Northern Nevada, beckoning visitors with an incredibly diverse range of geologic features, desert life, and adventurous experiences.

As the Owyhee Canyonlands stretch for hundreds of miles, there are several points of entry. The closest major metropolitan area with an airport is Boise. If you’re flying in, you’ll need to rent a 4×4 with high ground clearance and drive nearly 90 minutes to get to the edge of the wilderness area. Double-check that your rental car agreement permits off-road driving, or consider a specialty company such as Ribik.  READ MORE

 

01. April 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – USFS reorganization plan · Categories: BCHI /BCHA, Current Events, Public Lands


PDF: organizational-realignment-factsheet

On March 31, the U.S. Forest Service announced plans to move its headquarters from Washington, D.C., to Salt Lake City, Utah. It will also close or repurpose all nine of its regional offices, create 15 state offices, and shutter research and development facilities in more than 30 states. According to a news release, the plan is intended to make the agency more “nimble, efficient [and] effective.” Forest Service leaders told staff on a call after the announcement that no changes will be made to fire and aviation management programs or field-based operational firefighters.

Since first announcing its intent to reorganize the agency last July, the Trump administration has marketed the plan as a way to streamline Forest Service operations, with a focus on boosting timber production and communicating more closely with local communities. But during a congressional hearing and public comment period on the subject last summer, more than 80% of the 14,000 public comments submitted were negative, with many tribal representatives, conservation groups and former Forest Service staffers opposing the move. A U.S. Department of Agriculture summary of public comments included concerns that relocating Forest Service staff and further cuts to its budgets “could compromise ecological management, public access, and employee morale.” The current plan incorporates many elements of the original proposal, including the move to Salt Lake City and the closure of regional offices.

“Nobody is asking for this,” said Robert Bonnie, who oversaw the Forest Service as a Department of Agriculture undersecretary during the Obama administration. “None of the farm groups want this. No one in conservation wants this. Nobody.” To Bonnie and other former Forest Service staff, the plan, which will uproot thousands of employees, looks like it will only make the agency’s existing troubles worse, especially given the past year of deep cuts and chaos.

“This is not going to strengthen the Forest Service, it is going to weaken it,” Bonnie said. “It’s not about solving problems, it’s about blowing things up.”

MARY ERICKSON, a retired Custer Gallatin National Forest supervisor, had more questions than answers after the announcement. “I’m not going to say if it’s good or bad at this point,” she said. “It’s just such a sweeping change with no real analysis about if there would be cost savings.”

Under the new proposal, some states will have their own offices and others will be lumped together, similar to the organization of the Bureau of Land Management. This will be a new approach for the country’s 154 national forests, which have long been managed by the nine regional offices that will be shuttered or repurposed. Now, forests in Washington, Oregon, Montana, Alaska and Idaho will each be managed by their own state office. Forests in Nevada and Utah, however, will be managed together, as will forests in Colorado and Kansas.

Some Forest Service research facilities, including the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Fort Collins, Colorado, will stay open. Others, including the research station in Portland, Oregon, which is responsible for critical work on species like spotted owls, will be closed. Losing local leadership “is not going to improve the programs,” said former Forest Service wildlife biologist Eric Forsman. Forsman, who retired in 2016, studied spotted owls and red tree voles at the agency’s Forestry Sciences Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon, which will remain in operation. “It may help budgets,” he added, “but it won’t improve the quality of the research or the amount of research that gets done.”

Erickson and others were also concerned about the plan to move high-level bureaucrats out of D.C., where the nation’s law- and policymakers reside. “I would push back on this idea that moving out of D.C. is moving closer to the people you serve. That’s not the role of the national office,” Erickson said. The national office, she added, is supposed to coordinate and create guidance based on national policy. “Forests and districts have always been the heart of local communities and local delivery.”

After talking with current and former Forest Service staffers following Tuesday’s announcement, she also worries that, at least in the short term, disarray created by the reorganization will hamstring the agency’s ability to address the complex and worsening challenges that modern forests face. Those include tree disease outbreaks, the growing wildland-urban interface and climate change-induced drought. The Forest Service is already reeling from the loss of thousands of employees during the last year, through the terminations and deferred resignations effected by the now-defunct Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.

The reorganization may also lead to states playing an even bigger role in forest management, said Kevin Hood, executive director of Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, who retired in 2025 after decades working in the Forest Service throughout the West. While local coordination isn’t bad in theory, he said, he’s concerned the new structure will be a step toward ceding the management of national forests and other public lands to states.

Tribal representatives, several of whom declined to comment for this story, voiced concerns during the July public comment process that the reorganization would lead to losses of expertise and fractured relationships. Mass staff relocations, one representative wrote, would “destroy irreplaceable knowledge about Treaty rights, forest conditions, and working relationships built over decades, and new staff unfamiliar with the land will make mistakes.”

FOR MANY PEOPLE in conservation, the Forest Service reorganization feels like déjà vu, or even a recurring nightmare.

In 2019, during Trump’s first term, his administration announced a plan to move nearly all Bureau of Land Management staff out of the agency’s D.C. headquarters to Grand Junction, Colorado — then a 66,000-person city located hundreds of miles from a major airport. As with the March 31 Forest Service announcement, the administration said the change would put high-level staff closer to the mostly-Western lands they manage. Instead, many of those staff left the agency altogether, said Tracy Stone-Manning, who directed the BLM under President Joe Biden and is now president of The Wilderness Society.

In fact, by the time the Grand Junction office opened in 2020, only 41 of the 328 BLM employees expected to move West chose to do so, according to a High Country News investigation. For many, moving meant uprooting their entire family, and required a spouse to find a new job in a much smaller market.

The reorganization cost taxpayers $28 million. And the Biden administration ended up moving many high-level positions back to D.C., though it did keep some agency leaders in the Grand Junction office, which it renamed the agency’s “Western Headquarters.” John Gale, who headed the office for two years under Biden, sees merit in searching for ways to improve public-lands management. But restructuring and relocation need to be done thoughtfully and carefully to be effective, he said.

That’s because agencies lose irreplaceable institutional knowledge when people with decades of experience are forced out the door, said Stone-Manning. And while that may not have been the first Trump administration’s intention, it was indeed the outcome of the BLM reorganization. She and others expect the Forest Service to suffer the same fate, with even more dire results for the public.

“Our public lands are not being cared for the way they need to be,” she said. “And what that means is ultimately people will throw up their hands and say the federal government can’t manage them, let’s sell them off.”

19. March 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Stibnite Gold Project · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

For more than a decade, Perpetua Resources—the junior gold mining company behind the controversial Stibnite Gold Project—has peddled a shifting set of narratives to “sell” their project to Idahoans, investors, and the U.S. Government. As Perpetua moves toward a final investment decision on the project, it’s worth examining how well those narratives have really held up.

The original narrative Perpetua put forth was that their massive new mine was counterintuitively necessary to clean up historic mining issues at the site. However, the U.S. Forest Service concluded in their Final Record of Decision that taking no action at all to address the existing contamination at the site would be less harmful to the environment than proceeding with the Stibnite Gold Project, even assuming that the company’s mining and proposed cleanup work goes perfectly according to plan (which never happens). Perpetua also inaccurately claimed that restoration was only possible through the proposed mine; the Nez Perce Tribe in particular has invested millions of dollars to restore the surrounding watershed and clean up contamination from earlier mining operations at Stibnite.

Perpetua’s second narrative was that the antimony mined at Stibnite would help advance a broader transition to clean energy by supplying a key ingredient for a new type of liquid-metal battery. However, the company designing those batteries (Ambri) filed for bankruptcy in 2024, and you’d be hard pressed to hear Perpetua make any mention of clean energy since President Trump’s reelection.

More recently, Perpetua has leaned heavily on a third—and more politically potent—narrative: that the Stibnite Mine is essential to U.S. national security because it would provide antimony for military uses. At first glance, this claim is compelling. Antimony is used in a range of military applications, and reducing reliance on foreign supply chains for our national defense is a worthwhile goal. But a closer look reveals this argument for what it is: a convenient facade.

In a recent appearance on the mining investor podcast Mining Stock Daily, Perpetua CEO Jon Cherry said the quiet part out loud: “Antimony is the enabler because of the government’s support. The economics are driven all by the gold. Our mine plan is based on gold.” The message could not be more clear: Stibnite is not about antimony, it’s about the gold (and it always was).

Even on its own terms, the antimony narrative is full of holes. Perpetua has acknowledged that a mere 10% of Stibnite’s mined antimony ore will actually be routed to the military. And as it turns out, Stibnite’s antimony might not actually be high enough grade to meet the military’s standards. Recent reporting by Bloomberg highlighted that industry experts and some military officials don’t see Stibnite as the best domestic source of antimony, in part because of the high cost associated with refining their lower grade ore. Multiple projects being pursued elsewhere in the West contain notably higher grade antimony than Stibnite.

Perpetua’s evolving narratives to justify this mine have proved to be misleading at best and downright false at worst. Strip away the mining company rhetoric and what remains is an irresponsible, taxpayer-subsidized open-pit gold mine designed primarily to maximize returns for wealthy shareholders. Perpetua will essentially be using $80 million of government subsidies intended to support antimony production to take $18 billion worth of gold out of the ground. And unlike oil and gas companies that must pay a royalty back to the public for the resources they extract from public lands, Perpetua would pay no such royalties to exploit our public lands thanks to the antiquated Mining Law of 1872.

We need some mines in some places for some reasons. But a massive open-pit gold mine in the headwaters of the South Fork Salmon River—one of Idaho’s most ecologically important watersheds—simply to line investor pockets and stockpile gold bars in faraway vaults? No thanks.

19. March 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – The History & Future of America’s Public Land · Categories: Around The Campfire, Education, Public Lands

WATCH VIDEO

Walt Dabney, former National Park Service Superintendent and Texas State Park Director, discusses the history and future of America’s public lands. This presentation was filmed at a guide and outfitters training in Moab, Utah.  CNHA has supported the parks and public lands of southeastern Utah since 1967. Sales from our retail outlets & online store, memberships and donations support the education and research efforts of our public land partners: The National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management and USDA Forest Service.

16. March 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Trump’s BLM · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

READ:  BLM -All in on resource extraction

09. March 2026 · Comments Off on 2026 Sportsman Show booth · Categories: Around The Campfire, Public Lands, Trail Volunteer Groups


Back Country Horsemen of Idaho hosted a booth at the Idaho Sportsman Show March 5-6 that informed the public about all the various volunteer groups that do trail work on public lands as part of their charter.  Members from BCHI, ITA, SBFC, TVTMA, Boise Ridge Riders, CC-ATV, Emmett Rough Riders and Idaho ATV manned the booth during the show and handed out information about both motorized and non-motorized group that might be of interest to the show attendee’s.  They also told the public what their specific group does on public lands and how to get involved.  The general feeling was the booth was very successful and these groups have committed to supporting a “Trails” booth in 2027/

04. March 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – BLM vs Bison · Categories: Around The Campfire, Current Events, Public Lands

READ MORE

03. March 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – In the News · Categories: Around The Campfire, Current Events, Public Lands

Snow      //      White Water

09. February 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – ITA 2025 Annual Report · Categories: Around The Campfire, Public Lands

2025-Annual-Report-final

09. February 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Idaho’s Great Rift · Categories: Around The Campfire, Public Lands

And within it lies something just as remarkable: the Great Rift — a chain of deep volcanic cracks and fissures stretching across the landscape.
According to the Bureau of Land Management, it’s considered one of the largest and most recently formed volcanic rift systems on land in the continental United States.
“At 635 square miles, it is considered to be the largest, deepest, and most recent volcanic rift system in the continental United States,” the agency notes. “Many of Idaho’s most fascinating geological features lie along this potential wilderness.”

Idaho’s Great Rift is one of only a few known volcanic rift systems of its kind on Earth. Another, far more expansive rift, stretches from Ethiopia to Mozambique in eastern Africa.
“The Great Rift System is a volcanic rift zone that consists of eruptive fissures, cinder cones and other volcanic vents, non-eruptive fissures, and faults confined to a narrow belt,” the National Park Service’s website notes. “Most of the recent volcanic activity on the Snake River Plain is located along volcanic rift zones, which trend roughly perpendicular to the axis of the Snake River Plain.”
The Great Rift begins at Craters of the Moon — the northernmost lava field. The rift cuts down over 50 miles southeast from the Pioneer Mountains, landing at the Wapi Lava Field.

07. February 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Sage Grouse · Categories: Around The Campfire, Public Lands

Josephine Woolington Feb 2026

As a child, Lytle Denny learned where blue grouse, ruffed grouse, sharp-tailed grouse and greater sage grouse lived. A member of the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, he scouted the high-desert landscape during family hunting trips on the tribes’ ancestral homelands in southeastern Idaho. His dad preferred hunting deer and elk, but Denny developed an affinity for grouse.

The family hunted together as a group. Denny moved quietly through the silver-green sagebrush, hoping to hear the sudden heavy wingbeats of a startled bird. His family watched, waiting for a flush, not just of grouse but of mammals, too. “So it worked together,” he said. “We’d get birds and big game.”   READ MORE

Rare bird: Sage grouse are both unique and imperiled

Much of sage grouse physiology and behavior — from the yellow air sacs that males inflate during mating displays to the species’ preference for eating plants — is unusual for a bird.

Avian evolution has favored light weight for easier flight, leading to hollow bones and small organs. But sage grouse evolved “heavy machinery,” as Boise State University researcher Jennifer Forbey described it — large organs and specialized guts — to digest sagebrush leaves, which are toxic to most animals.

From September to February, sage grouse eat sagebrush almost exclusively, preferring the tiny, silver-green leaves of low-growing species like early and mountain big sage. Scientists have found that these species fluoresce under ultraviolet light due to chemical properties in their leaves. Sage grouse have photoreceptors in their eyes that allow them to see UV light, and researchers like Forbey think that this glow may help the birds locate the plants. Female grouse teach their chicks where to find food, passing on what Forbey called “nutritional wisdom.” Both males and females return to the same breeding, nesting and chick-rearing sites every year, generation after generation.

But the birds’ loyalty and diet are no longer well-suited for today’s landscape, transformed since settlers arrived.

Every year, 1.3 million acres of sagebrush steppe is lost, primarily to wildfires fueled by cheatgrass that has spread, in part, by way of extensive livestock grazing. Unfortunately, animals that rely heavily on one food source — like koalas, pandas and sage grouse — “tend to be the most vulnerable to extinction,” Forbey said.  — Josephine Woolington

07. February 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Unified Wildland Firefighting Agency · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

Interior Dept blazes ahead on unified wildland firefighting agency, without Congress endorsing plans

The Wildland Fire Service also stops short of folding in wildland fire personnel or programs from the USDA’s Forest Service.
The Interior Department is blazing ahead with a reorganization plan that will bring all of its wildland firefighting operations into a single agency.

Starting next week, the department’s wildland fire employees and programs will be moved into a new Wildland Fire Service.

Congress did not approve funds for the consolidation of federal firefighting programs into a single agency. The Wildland Fire Service also stops short of merging wildland fire personnel or programs from the USDA’s Forest Service with those same resources at the Interior Department.

An internal memo sent to staff on Monday states the Wildland Fire Service “will unify wildland fire management within DOI only.”

According to the memo, obtained by Federal News Network, the Wildland Fire Service will “align operations” with USDA through shared procurement, predictive services, research, and policy reforms.

“The success of these efforts will rely on ongoing support from Congress to secure the necessary funding and authorities needed to implement and sustain these important reforms,” the memo states.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order last summer requiring the Interior Department and USDA to consolidate their wildland fire programs “to the maximum degree practicable and consistent with applicable law.” The Trump administration’s fiscal 2026 budget request noted that wildland fire response has been split across five agencies in two departments.

A comprehensive spending deal to fund the Interior Department through the end of fiscal 2026 did not endorse the Trump administration’s plans to consolidate federal wildland firefighting operations into a single agency.

Democrats on the Senate Appropriations Committee wrote in a summary of the Interior spending bill last month that the spending package “specifically provides funding to continue wildland firefighting using the longstanding practice of funding both the U.S. Forest Service and the Department of the Interior to allow Congress to consider legislative proposals for such a major change.”

Most of Interior’s wildland fire personnel will move over to the Wildland Fire Service starting Feb. 8. Last month, Brian Fennessy, former chief of the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department and former fire chief of the Orange County Fire Authority, was tapped to serve as the new chief of the Wildland Fire Service.

The Wildland Fire Service will merge the wildland fire operations of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Bureau of Land Management, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the Office of Aviation Services and the Office of Wildland Fire.
By unifying wildland fire programs spread across four DOI bureaus and two offices, the Interior Department expects to “eliminate redundancies and build a more cohesive workforce.”

“This integration paves the way for streamlined training, stronger recruitment, and greater career growth for Interior wildland fire personnel,” the memo states.

Last fall, an employee group called Grassroots Wildland Firefighters applauded greater coordination between the Interior Department and the Forest Service but said these actions “do not yet go far enough.”

“We know the limits of what can be done through executive action alone. At the same time, we know the limits of what can be done through executive action alone. Lasting reform — true consolidation of our nation’s wildfire workforce under experienced fire leaders in a single, mission-driven organization — will ultimately require congressional action,” the group said in a press release.

Interior said the next steps to stand up the Wildland Fire Service will “occur in deliberative phases to ensure continuity of operations and readiness for wildfire activity in 2026.”

Interior Secretary Burgum issued a departmentwide order last month calling for the unification of the disparate wildland fire operations and activities.

An earlier order from Burgum specified that the Wildland Fire Service would function more as a “strategic alignment of resources” between Interior and the Forest Service, including early fire detection technology, planes and vehicles and modernized communication tools, to ensure “cross-team coordination when jointly fighting wildland fires.”

Wildfires cost the United States hundreds of billions of dollars, posing a risk to national security, public health, energy infrastructure and water sources.

Monday’s memo states that the Wildland Fire Service “positions DOI to harness cutting-edge technology more efficiently,” and invest in advanced wildland firefighting tools.

“By streamlining the chain of command from the firefighter on the ground straight up to the chief, the USWFS will eliminate bureaucratic hurdles and ensure decisive, timely action during wildfire incidents. This clarity in decision-making will strengthen coordination and accelerate response efforts when every second counts,” the memo states.

Tribal wildland fire programs will also be included in the new Wildland Fire Service.  The memo states the Interior Department will continue to “honor and administer” current contracts and agreements with tribal wildland fire authorities, and that its Bureau of Indian Affairs will help transfer existing contracts and agreements over to the Wildland Fire Service.

27. January 2026 · Comments Off on Education – Wolf / Cougar Study in Yellowstone National Park · Categories: Education, Public Lands

Wolf-Cougar Study YNP

22. January 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – BLM Director Who Wants to Sell Public Land | Fresh Tracks Weekly · Categories: Education, Public Lands

WATCH VIDEO

22. January 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – US House votes Wednesday to strip conservation measures that safeguard the wilderness · Categories: Around The Campfire, Current Events, Public Lands

The U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed a resolution Wednesday that puts a copper-nickel mine on the edge of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness one step closer to reality. Taking an unprecedented approach to using the relatively novel Congressional Review Act, the House voted 214-208 in favor of overturning a 20-year mining moratorium that was established in 2023. These current protections cover 225,504 acres in the Superior National Forest and center around the Rainy River Watershed that lies upstream of the BWCA.

“The Boundary Waters is the pinnacle of wild places,” says Matthew Schultz with Sportsmen for the Boundary Waters. “The chance of polluting a place like that to me is pretty crazy. It just doesn’t shake out.”  READ MORE

22. January 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Idaho constitutional amendment proposed by state senator · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands
Idaho Sen. Ben Adams public lands amendment

 Idaho state Sen. Ben Adams, R-Nampa, introduces a proposed amendment to the Idaho Constitution that prevents the state from selling future public lands it obtains from the federal government. (Clark Corbin/Idaho Capital Sun)

An Idaho state senator on Wednesday introduced a proposal to amend the state constitution to protect public lands acquired by the state from the federal government.

Sen. Ben Adams, R-Nampa, first announced his proposal in August, well ahead of the 2026 legislative session that began this month, the Idaho Capital Sun previously reported. He unveiled the draft text of the amendment later that month.

Adams told the Senate State Affairs Committee on Wednesday that since unveiling his proposal, he’s had conversations with residents and industry leaders all over the state.

“I wanted feedback. I wanted a lot of feedback, because it deals with a very personal matter for every Idahoan, and that is our public land here in Idaho,” Adams said.

He said he slightly changed the text from his August proposal, but “the intent did not change.”   READ MORE

20. January 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Our nations trails are disappearing · Categories: Around The Campfire, Current Events, Public Lands

WHAT’S BEHIND ALL THIS deferred maintenance? According to Forest Service staffing
reports from 2019, the agency’s workforce has contracted substantially over the last 30
years, losing roughly 20% of its staff. Under the Trump administration, full-time staffing
has decreased by an additional 10% due to DOGE layoffs, though this
month’s Congressional appropriations bill spared the agency the worst of the drastic
2026 budget cuts proposed by the White House last year.
Recreational trail staff, once robust in the 1980s, has dwindled with these reductions in
force, with many districts reporting zero, or just one, permanent recreation staff and
fewer than three seasonal staff to oversee hundreds of miles of trail. A July 2025
internal Forest Service report, shared with me by a confidential source, concluded that
each of the agency’s nine regions were missing up to 80% of their trail and recreation
workers.

December’s follow-up Forest Service report quoted a chorus of disaffected anonymous
rangers. “My trail program is suffering the worst morale setbacks of all my district
programs,” said one acting district ranger. “We lost 200 years of trail experience this
year,” said a forest recreation manager. One district trail manager was considering
packing in a multi-decade career altogether. “It feels like 24 years of trails and
wilderness work,” they said, “rolling back to the bottom of the hill.”
Volunteers and local stewardship groups have had to show up in force, demonstrating
the value Americans place on access to public lands. In fiscal year 2023, 71,660
volunteers contributed 2.6 million hours of service to the Forest Service, more than
double the hours logged by agency employees. Yet even that tidal wave of donated labor
can only slow, not reverse, the decline of infrastructure compounded over decades of
mismanagement.

At the highest levels of government, on both sides of the aisle, politicians acknowledge
this systemic neglect. During his Senate confirmation hearing, now-Secretary of the
Interior Doug Burgum agreed that addressing the maintenance backlog was crucial: “We
just have to make sure not just the national parks, but across the whole department, we
have to get the formulas right, because we are creating liabilities for future generations
if we are not taking care of that deferred maintenance.”

READ FULL STORY:  Public Land Trails are Disappearing

15. January 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – Interior Moves to Open All Federal Lands to Hunting and Fishing by Default · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

The U.S. Department of the Interior is preparing to issue a new directive that would make hunting and fishing the default use across most Interior-managed public lands unless specific closures are justified.

What’s new: Under this framework, federal lands would be considered open to hunting and fishing unless a closure is required by law, public safety concerns, or documented resource protection needs. Closures will require clear er justification, higher-level approval, and better documentation.

This does not create new hunting or fishing rights or eliminate conservation safeguards. It does, however, flip the starting assumption. Hunting and fishing would be treated as a default use of federal lands, not an exception.

What land does it a pply to? The order would apply to areas controlled by the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Bureau of Reclamation. Some units within the National Park Service that already permit hunting would also fall under the framework.

What land is excluded? Areas closed to hunting by statute would remain closed. Lands managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs would not be affected. READ MORE

03. January 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands -Wind Event caused Hundreds of down tree’s in Boise County · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

BOISE, Idaho — Winter riders looking to hit the snow at Pilot Peak and Mores Creek Summit in Boise County should avoid the area due to poor snow conditions and downed trees.

Boise County Grooming 8A, a group that maintains snowmobile trails and winter parking lots, said it was astonished by how many trees had fallen in the area Thursday.

“These are not little ones either,” officials said on social media. “There is hundreds and hundreds of trees down all over, I have never seen anything like it. There is no way to cut them all, we need multiple feet of snow to cover a lot of them.”

Boise County officials said even if it gets good snowfall, the area will be challenging to groom, as “[they] are going to need a lot of snow to be able to groom over and around this huge mess.”

“In the 39 years of riding Mores Creek area I have never seen anything close to what we seen today,” Boise County Grooming 8A said.

The Boise County Sheriff’s Office said riders should avoid the area for safety concerns due to a 3-foot snow base. Mores Creek Summit is recommended for expert riders, and the approximate Thursday’s snow base is 0 feet.  LINK TO STORY

02. January 2026 · Comments Off on Public Lands – USFS works sound alarm about Trails · Categories: Current Events, Public Lands

Union representatives for U.S. Forest Service workers in the Sawtooth and Salmon-Challis national forests are echoing some conclusions stated in an internal Forest Service trails report recently obtained and published by The Washington Post describing widespread public and employee dissatisfaction with trails on federally-managed public lands.

The internal report, published on Tuesday, Dec. 16, stated that services and public satisfaction in national forests across the U.S. will “continue to decline in 2026 and beyond without direction to prioritize investments in recreation generally and the trails program specifically.”

The report also stated that some districts across the country have lost up to 100% of their trails staff and “hundreds of years of trail expertise.” It stated that Forest Service staff are experiencing stress and burnout.

In late 2024, the Forest Service announced that it would lay off its entire seasonal, nonfirefighter workforce for the upcoming fiscal year due to budget constraints.

READ STORY:  Union representatives for USFS-Jan2           //        USFS 2025 Trail Status Summary