All of us non-profits need to help support each other. LINK TO FUNDRAISER
The Pet Adoption League of Gem County (PAL) major fundraiser for 2026 is a drawing for 2 e-bikes. Tickets are $20. Tickets can be purchased on-line. I can also provide tickets for sale.
Please see the attached flyer. PAL services all of Gem County. PAL also helps Boise and Payette Counties who have no or very limited services. PAL survives 99% on donations. PAL receives a very tiny bit of grant money from the Idaho Pet License Plates. This fund raiser helps keep the shelter open, help the shelter reunite pets with the owners and helps the shelter find loving homes for dogs and cats that have no home.
Thank you very much.
Regards – Ellen
🐴 Horse Joins Yellowstone Bison Herd, Refuses to Return – A 6-year-old mustang named Evie has been on the lam all summer after shirking her duties as a Yellowstone pack horse and taking up residence with a herd of bison. A feral horse on the Navajo Reservation for the first five years of her life, Evie was purchased at auction last year and had just completed her first packing trip in the park. But after becoming entangled in an electric fence, she escaped and eventually joined the bison herd near the park’s northern boundary. The National Park Service wants her evicted from the park, but despite wranglers’ efforts over the last two months, she’s made it clear she’s not interested in going back. Read full story
Hello Directors,
As promised, I am working on the photo criteria for the 2028 Calendar Photo submissions. They will be due December 31st.
What I need from your chapters is the email for one person designated by your chapter for photos. This will be the only person with access to our Dropbox – where they will deposit photos from your chapter.
Please get this to me be Friday…or else one of the directors will be chosen at random 😉
Thank you,
Robin Pilkington
Secretary BCHI
• Idaho-55 Banks-Lowman Intersection: ITD is developing plans for the Idaho-55 Banks-Lowman Intersection, and they want your input. Check out the online meeting here to see the concepts and take the survey.
The Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Board is seeking to change a section of the Idaho Centennial Trail’s official route to improve hikers’ safety and avoid a dangerous creek crossing, state officials announced Sept. 3.
The Idaho Centennial Trail, or ICT for short, is a more than 900-mile trail that crosses the entire state of Idaho, from the desert at the Idaho-Nevada border, all the way up to the Canadian border. Along the route, the trail passes through some of the most wild, scenic and remote places in Idaho, including the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness, the Sawtooth Wilderness and the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness.
Although a few people complete the Idaho Centennial Trail as a thru-hike in a single, months-long push, the trail is broken up into segments and utilizes other, existing trails to allow different users the opportunity to enjoy smaller sections of the trail without having to navigate the entire trail.
The new route change involves adding about nine miles to the Idaho Centennial Trail to avoid an unabridged crossing of Big Creek in the Salmon-Challis National Forest.
Rather than forcing hikers and backpackers to ford Big Creek, the new route will follow Milk Creek Trail 064 and Monumental Creek Trail 005 to allow hikers to safely cross Big Creek at a bridge near the junction with Monumental Creek, Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation officials said.
“A longer trail isn’t always a better trail, but in this case, the additional miles provide a significant safety benefit,” Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Director Susan Buxton said in a written statement. “By routing the Idaho Centennial Trail across an existing bridge, we can help ensure that more people can experience this incredible section of the ICT without having to take on a potentially dangerous creek crossing.”
The official route for the Idaho Continental Trail was approved in 1990 by the Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Board, which has the authority to change routes on the trail in partnership with land managers and the public.
Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation officials said their counterparts with the Salmon-Challis National Forest support the change, and they are opening a 30-day public comment period about the route change.
To offer public comment, send an email to Hailey Husband, the Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation’s nonmotorized trails coordinator, at hailey.husband@idpr.idaho.gov or call 208-514-2419.
When trails snaking through Wyoming’s 9 million acres of national forests go unmaintained or unused, nature can begin to reclaim them with remarkable speed.
Look no further than sections of the Wyoming National Recreation Trail in the Bridger-Teton National Forest’s Big Piney District, where the path had become barely discernable under a mat of scrubby grasses.
“It’s just been overgrown for years,” said former U.S. Forest Service employee Monica Elliott.
It was there that Wyoming’s newest trails crew, the Forest Corps — which Elliott manages — landed in July for a work hitch to assist the district recreation staff. After eight days of digging, clearing and delineating, voilá. The trail boasted the shiny new-dirt look of a just-constructed path.
It was among the 2026 projects undertaken by the Forest Corps. The nonprofit Friends of the Bridger-Teton created the Forest Corps in 2025 after seeing U.S. Forest Service district offices hollowed out by DOGE cuts and facing mounting maintenance backlogs.
The Corps was designed explicitly to help the agency on summer-season field projects in the Bridger-Teton National Forest, one of eight national forests within Wyoming’s borders. Friends of the Bridger-Teton hired former U.S. Forest Service staff, including Elliott, who had lost her job in the cuts, for the Corps.
In its inaugural season, the team communicated with each of the Bridger-Teton forest’s six districts to identify a high-impact project to assist on. The Corps painted picnic tables, installed a puncheon trail over marshy terrain and cleared trails in wildfire burn areas.
Once the demand for such an auxiliary crew became clear to the Friends nonprofit, which works to assist its namesake national forest in managing visitor impacts, the organization decided to make the initiative permanent.
Even with the Forest Service rehiring many of its seasonal recreation workers in 2026, Elliott said, “there is so much need” when it comes to maintaining the inventory of trails and infrastructure on the 3.4-million-acre Bridger-Teton National Forest.
This summer, the crew has worked six hitches lasting eight days and a couple lasting four. Along with projects like the Big Piney region trail, Elliott and the four-person team have cleared 700 downed trees from 80 miles of trail across the forest, including the Pack Creek Fire burn area.
The season’s not over yet; the Forest Corps still has two hitches to go.
There hasn’t been one dramatic test that sold me on the StepRanger. What’s impressed me most is how often it solves boring, repetitive problems. That’s also why it’s become so useful.
BOISE, Idaho — Outdoor recreation in Idaho is set for an improvement, according to an expanded partnership between state and federal agencies.
The Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation and the U.S. Forest Service announced that they are expanding their partnership through two Good Neighbor Authority recreation agreements that will “improve trails, restore access to public lands and enhance outdoor recreation opportunities across Idaho.”
The first recreation agreement covers the Idaho Panhandle and Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests, utilizing the EXPLORE Act’s Good Neighbor Authority recreation pilot.
This first-of-its-kind agreement will provide “approximately $166,000 for recreation improvements, including maintenance of 115 miles of non-motorized trails and new or upgraded signage across 1,200 miles of winter recreation trails throughout North Idaho.”
The second agreement includes the Salmon-Challis National Forest and intends to improve recreation access for Idahoans within the Frank Church Wilderness and its surrounding areas.
According to this agreement, “IDPR will assist with clearing downed trees and other obstacles from portions of 542 miles of trail impacted by wildfire, insects, and disease, while also supporting construction of a motorized trail that restores public access to a significant area of Idaho’s backcountry.”
“These agreements represent the future of public land stewardship in Idaho,” said Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Director Susan Buxton in a news release. “By partnering with the U.S. Forest Service through the Good Neighbor Authority, we’re protecting some of Idaho’s most treasured landscapes while making them more accessible for residents and visitors alike. Together, we’re ensuring our trails and recreation opportunities remain safe, sustainable and enjoyable for generations to come.”
Both agreements build upon the EXPLORE Act of 2025, which paved the way for state and federal agencies to work together on recreation projects that improve public access and stewardship of National Forest lands.
“The Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests and Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation have a long-standing history of working together to improve and maintain recreational access and opportunities,” said Forest Supervisor for the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests Jon Word. “Expanding this partnership through Good Neighbor Authority leverages our shared resources across boundaries, benefiting the public and the places we love to recreate.”
For those who enjoy the great outdoors, it seems this latest collaborative effort will expand and preserve opportunities in the wild for Idahoans to partake in.
A second wave of international help has arrived in Idaho to help fight fires in the Northwest and Great Basin, after the National Multi-Agency Coordinating Group, located in Boise, asked for help.
Nearly 200 firefighters from Australia and New Zealand landed at the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) in Boise last week and have since undergone several days of orientation, training, and national situation briefings.
Previously, 74 fire management specialists, including a 15-person incident management team, from New Zealand and Australia arrived in Boise and have been working with U.S. personnel to “support command and control, planning, logistics, operations, and safety oversight.”
In a news release, NIFC said, “Their deployment will enhance staffing depth during a period of sustained wildfire activity and will help ensure safe, effective, and well-coordinated operations. All international specialists are fully qualified based on U.S. wildland fire standards and will be fully embedded within U.S. incident command structures throughout their assignments.”
NIFC said the specialists from down under bring “diverse expertise, including aviation operations, fireline leadership, prevention and mitigation strategies, and emergency communications support.”
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the U.S. Forest Service has had a working relationship with Australia and New Zealand through the Forest Fire Management Group since the 1950s, but picked up steam in the 2000s.
Currently, one of the largest fires burning in the country is the Big Grass Fire in Eastern Oregon and into Southwestern Idaho. It has burned more than 579,000 acres and is currently 85% contained. It was started by lightning on July 23.
In an online briefing Wednesday, NIFC said the “Northwest remains the nation’s most active fire area, with 34 uncontained large fires. High temperatures and wind are predicted in several geographic areas, bringing the potential for new starts and/or rapid spread.” As of July 18, the NIFC has put the country at National Preparedness Level 5, the highest level based on “fire activity, weather, fuel conditions, and resource availability.”
|
A recently discovered virus with no vaccine, medication, or commercially available test has been confirmed in New York for the first time. The discovery suggests the spread of the Bourbon virus along with its primary carrier, the Lone Star tick. First discovered in 2014 in Kansas, the Bourbon virus causes fever, fatigue, rash, headache, body aches, nausea, and vomiting. In extreme cases, it can even be fatal. While diagnoses of Bourbon virus are rare — only five cases as of 2024 — the lack of testing and non-specific symptoms lead authorities to believe it could be much more widespread.
Sawmill Fire Swamper Chainsaw Cut 2026 | Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center
Description:
On June 19, 2026, a U.S. Forest Service wildland fire module was assigned to the Sawmill Fire near Cedar City, UT. The module was tasked with securing the fire’s edge and cleaning up ladder fuels to keep the fire out of the canopy. A saw team module, consisting of one sawyer and two swampers, moved steadily from tree to tree, limbing junipers while carefully managing each branch to keep it from dropping into the hot duff and subsequently dragging heat out into the “green” side of the fireline.
During one of these operations, the sawyer was cutting through a juniper limb, planning to continue directly into the next one. The swamper stood opposite, holding both limbs—one in each hand—to control their fall. As the saw finished the first cut and transitioned toward the second, it struck the swamper’s left thumb. The injury was immediate and severe.
The injury required eleven stitches for temporary closure. Future surgery will be required to repair tendons that were also severed. The expected recovery period is from six to eight weeks.
Sawmill Fire Swamper Chainsaw Cut RLS
Description: On a clear spring morning in the mountains of northern California, a group of C-Evaluators and U.S. Forest Service Regional Saw Program Managers were gathered for the final day of a national saw workshop.
After sizing up the tree, the faller verbalized the elements of the OHLEC process (a standardized five-step safety and risk assessment framework for tree felling) to the two evaluators. His plan was to take the tree straight downslope (aligned with the primary head lean) into an open lay. He would utilize a double Humboldt face cut using a Stihl 500i chainsaw equipped with a 28-inch bar. The bole of the tree had a distinctly oval shape with the long axis oriented parallel to the slope.
The faller fired up his saw and completed his initial cuts without issue. After knocking out the “pie”-shaped section and cleaning up the face cut, he elected to perform a boring cut straight through the hinge and into the center of the tree. His intent was to remove wood from the middle of the tree to ensure that he had adequate bar length to complete his planned double back cut from the uphill side.
First, the faller verbalizes his intent to “bore the guts” to the evaluators. He then steps downslope in front of the tree, lifts the powerhead and throttles up the saw. As he begins his boring cut, his right hand holds the throttle handle with a palm-down (pronated) grip. His left hand is located near the lower corner of the handlebar with a slightly supinated grip. The kickback occurs almost immediately.
The bar swung back and slammed into the sawyer’s right shoulder.
National Chainsaw Workshop Kickback Injury RLS
Good evening, Please see the following Lessons Learned Center release regarding two saw injuries that happened recently; one due to kick back and one occurring to a swamper. Please review these with your crews and modules to highlight the risks/hazards associated with some chainsaw operations along with some lessons shared by those involved in these events. Thanks and please reach out if you have any questions.
May 29, 2026 – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
SUWA Statement on President Trump’s Repeal of Travel Management Executive Orders – 5.29.26
Will bring unregulated motorized recreation and chaos across public lands
Contacts:
Grant Stevens, Communications Director, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA); (319) 427-0260; grant@suwa.org
Washington, DC – Friday evening, in his latest attack on federal public lands, President Trump announced the repeal of Executive Order 11644 of February 8, 1972 (Use of Off-Road Vehicles on the Public Lands), and Executive Order 11989 of May 24, 1977 (Off-Road Vehicles on Public Lands). He further directed federal land management agencies including the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service to rescind or revise their regulations implementing these Orders. Below is a statement from SUWA Legal Director Steve Bloch and additional information.
“The reality is that there are tens of thousands of miles of dirt roads and trails in Utah’s canyon country open today to motorized vehicles. Far from motorized vehicles being kept out of public lands, it’s quite the opposite: it’s the wildlife and visitors trying to picnic or camp with their families that are being chased out at every turn,” said Steve Bloch, Legal Director at the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA). “These executive orders provided the foundation for common-sense management of motorized vehicles on public lands. They recognized the destructive impact unmanaged motor vehicles have on our public lands and required federal agencies to minimize the damage. The impacts of today’s Order will be significant, long-lasting, and devastating.”
About Executive Orders 11644 and 11989
Presidents Nixon and Carter issued Executive Orders 11644 and 11989 in 1972 and 1977, respectively, in response to the growing use of dirt bikes, snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, and other off-road vehicles (ORVs) and corresponding environmental damage and conflicts with non-motorized recreationists. These executive orders require federal land managers to plan for ORV use to protect resources and other recreational uses. Specifically, the executive orders require that, when designating areas or trails available for ORV use, the agencies locate them to:
(1) minimize damage to soil, watershed, vegetation, and other resources of the public lands;
(2) minimize harassment of wildlife or significant disruption of wildlife habitats; and
(3) minimize conflicts between off-road vehicle use and other existing or proposed recreational uses of the same or neighboring public lands.
SUWA Statement on President Trump’s Repeal of Travel Management Executive Orders – 5.29.26
New Communication Tools in Play
The Sawtooth National Forest will be implementing a couple new communication tools to keep stakeholders informed about what’s happening on the Forest now and what’s on our horizon.
New Subscription Email Distribution System
We are so excited to be sharing this email through a new subscription email distribution system. Aside from being able to share what’s happening on the forest with stakeholders directly, the best part of this system is that stakeholders control whether or not they continue to receive these updates. Subscription and personal profiles can be managed in the footer of this email.
New users can subscribe for these updates themselves on our Keep in Touch webpage. We do want to warn those who choose to share these emails with others that each distributed email is tied directly to a specific email and profile. So, if you share the email with someone who doesn’t want to continue receiving updates, they may unintentionally unsubscribe you from our lists thinking they are doing it for themselves. To avoid this confusion, we will, as much as possible, put the bulk of the the content we want to share on our website so you can alternatively share the website addresses to the main content.
| As a side and stomach sleeper, I despise mummy-style sleeping bags. I always feel too confined, and, in the morning, my hip flexors are tight and sore. For a long time, I thought that was my cross to bear as a backpacker who wanted a lightweight bag, until I found NEMO’s Disco 15 Sleeping Bag ($300). |
| The Disco 15 has a more generous, roomy fit than a typical mummy bag, with what NEMO calls a “spoon shape.” There’s extra space for my elbows and knees, allowing me to roll around and splay out in comfort. |
| While it’s not ultralight at 3 pounds, 5 ounces, the bag is certainly light enough to bring on a week-long backpacking trip. |
| Perhaps most importantly for camping/backpacking gear, this bag is durable. I’ve had it for 5 years, and it’s seen everything: mud, sweat, and my dogs (and their vomit). When I snuggle up in the Disco 15 to go to bed, I’m just as warm and cozy as I was on night 1. |
| Product score: 7.9/10 |
The U.S. Forest Service has granted a rare exemption allowing the use of chainsaws in one of the country’s largest wilderness areas.
The agency on Wednesday approved a request from the Idaho Outfitters and Guides Association to temporarily use gas-powered chainsaws to clear about 542 miles of trails in the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness, citing “extraordinary levels” of downed trees. The Frank Church, in central Idaho, is the largest contiguous wilderness area in the lower 48 states.
“This action is necessary to restore safe public access while minimizing impacts to wilderness character and remaining fully compliant with the Wilderness Act of 1964,” Amy Baumer, a spokesperson for the Salmon-Challis National Forest, wrote in an email.
Trees blocking trails
Trail crews typically rely on hand tools such as crosscut saws in designated wilderness areas, which are among the most protected public lands. The Wilderness Act prohibits motorized vehicles and equipment to protect places “untrammeled by man” and to preserve “solitude.”
These exclusions have long been interpreted to include chainsaws, though the Forest Service grants occasional exceptions, usually after wildfires or major storms.
But the Idaho Outfitters and Guides Association (IOGA) petitioned the agency last year, arguing that decades of wildfire and disease have created an unmanageable buildup of fallen trees. A Forest Service survey last year estimated between 80,000 and 110,000 trees lying along one 150-mile stretch in the Frank Church.
“Almost half the trails in this wilderness area on the Salmon-Challis are unusable,” said Erik Weiseth, the executive director of IOGA. “Over time, they will just be overgrown and disappear. That is not only hurting our outfitter members, but it’s also hurting the general public. It’s hurting their ability to access the wilderness.”
Weiseth said the blockages have meant lost business for outfitters who can’t get to the spots where they’re authorized to run hunting or guided horseback trips. Volunteers and a shrinking Forest Service workforce have struggled to keep trails open with hand tools, he said. He also pointed to language in the law specific to the Frank Church wilderness, which directs the agency to clear trails annually “to the maximum extent practicable.”
What’s allowed in wilderness?
In a letter on Wednesday, the nonprofit Wilderness Watch asked the Forest Service to delay implementation until 2027 to allow time for judicial review “before the wilderness is overrun with chainsaws.”
George Nickas, the executive director of the Missoula-based organization, called the authorization “just blatantly illegal” and said the organization is considering legal action.
“Getting in there with chainsaws to clear all these trails – it’s all about domination. It’s all about our controlling what’s going on there, our wanting to change the character of the wilderness to meet our demands,” he said. “That’s just the antithesis of what the Wilderness Act is all about.”
The group said it learned of discussions between IOGA and Forest Service officials, including Chief Tom Schultz who is from Idaho, through public records requests. It criticized the agency for not allowing public comment before the approval.
Nickas said the decision could have implications beyond Idaho. Public records reviewed by the group indicated outfitters in Wyoming asked the agency to allow battery-operated chainsaws for trail maintenance.
In 2019, the Forest Service approved chainsaw use in two wilderness areas in Colorado. Conservation groups including Wilderness Watch sued, and the agency later withdrew the proposal.
U.S. Forest Service
The authorization by the Forest Service in the Frank Church allows licensed outfitters to use chainsaws for three years from Jan. 1 through Aug. 1 each year.
Weiseth said that by Wednesday afternoon, authorized outfitters were already in the forest clearing logs.
“This is a big deal to these guys. They’ve been wanting to get some of these trails open for a decade or more,” he said. “They threw their stuff in the truck and started driving to the woods, ready to go.”
This story was produced by the Mountain West News Bureau, a collaboration between Wyoming Public Media, Nevada Public Radio, Boise State Public Radio in Idaho, KUNR in Nevada, KUNC in Northern Colorado, KANW in New Mexico, Colorado Public Radio, KJZZ in Arizona and NPR, with additional support from affiliate newsrooms across the region. Funding for the Mountain West News Bureau is provided in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and Eric and Wendy Schmidt.
News Release: Coalition of Conservation Groups Asks Court to Halt Construction of Stibnite Gold Mine
For Immediate Release: Tuesday, May 12, 2026
Contacts:
John Robison, Idaho Conservation League, (208) 345-6933 x 213
Nick Kunath, Idaho Rivers United, (208) 908-9232
Fred Coriell, Save the South Fork Salmon, (208) 315-3630
Jared Naimark, Earthworks, (650) 213-8052
Marc Fink, Senior Attorney, Center for Biological Diversity, (218) 464-0539
Coalition of Conservation Groups Asks Court to Halt Construction of Stibnite Gold Mine
Boise, ID — A coalition of local and national conservation groups filed a motion preliminary injunction last Friday to halt Perpetua Resource’s pending construction of the Stibnite Gold Project: an open-pit cyanide leach gold mine in the headwaters of the South Fork of the Salmon River. The motion asks to halt construction of the mine on public lands, including constructing a new access road cutting through Idaho’s Salmon River Mountains, in order to protect the environment and “threatened” species.
In February 2025, the conservation groups filed suit in federal district court against the U. S. Forest Service for violating the National Environmental Protection Act and other bedrock environmental laws in approving the mine, which would be located mostly on National Forest lands. The lawsuit is also against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for violating the Endangered Species Act by failing to protect threatened bull trout, wolverine, and whitebark pine. The Forest Service’s own analysis shows that the project area would not be restored as Perpetua claims but would actually be worse off if the project proceeds—even if the proposed restoration work goes perfectly according to plan.
Last fall, the conservation groups and Perpetua reached an agreement allowing limited pre-construction activities to occur while the lawsuit was being briefed. Briefing concluded earlier this year (see “Case Filings” here). Perpetua now seeks to commence “full construction” at the end of May, without waiting for a final decision from the Court.
Among other initial mine construction activities, Perpetua has indicated it will start constructing the Burntlog Route: a second and new access road to the mine site, through protected roadless and riparian areas and threatened species habitat. Perpetua would reconstruct and widen 23 miles of existing road on National Forest to be approximately four times wider than standard roads in the area to accommodate industrial mine traffic. To complete the Route, Perpetua would also build 15 miles of new road through remote wildlife habitat, mostly in inventoried roadless areas.
“The South Fork Salmon River and everything and everyone who depends on it are at risk if the government allows our public lands to be monetized to benefit billionaires,” said John Robison, Public Lands and Wildlife Director for the Idaho Conservation League. “We believe the South Fork Salmon River deserves its day in court before Perpetua Resources and its financiers rush ahead and make irreversible changes to this special area.”
The Stibnite site is 45 air miles from McCall, Idaho, adjacent to the Frank Church–River of No Return Wilderness Area and is within the homelands of the Nez Perce Tribe. Perpetua’s massive mine plan entails excavating three open pits. It would create 280 million tons of waste rock and include constructing a 475-foot tall, 120-million-ton tailings storage facility—more than 1.5 times taller than the Statue of Liberty. One of the open pits would extend more than 720 feet beneath the riverbed of the East Fork South Fork Salmon River. Perpetua would also build an extensive web of roads, power lines, and other industrial infrastructure across public lands to reach the remote mine site.
“We’re seeking to prevent this special part of Idaho from being irreversibly damaged before the legal process has run its course,” said Bryan Hurlbutt, staff attorney at Advocates for the West and counsel for the conservation groups. “Our preliminary injunction motion asks the Court to preserve the status quo until it issues a final ruling in the lawsuit.”
“Rushing to construct the mine is just one more instance of Perpetua putting its profits first, instead of being the ‘good neighbor’ the company pitches to the community,” said Judy Anderson of Save the South Fork Salmon.
“In light of Perpetua’s push to begin full construction, court intervention is necessary to protect critical habitat in the South Fork Salmon watershed from damages that simply cannot be undone,” said Nick Kunath, Conservation Director at Idaho Rivers United. “This watershed and all that it provides deserves much more than allowing Perpetua to plow forward with damaging activities before the case before the court has had a chance to be resolved.”
“The rush to make a profit is not more important than the law,” said Jared Naimark, Western Mining Senior Manager at Earthworks. “Legal protections exist to ensure the South Fork of the Salmon River, our National Forests, and the animals that call these lands and waters home are taken care of for generations to come. The proposed Burntlog route is an unlawfully approved second access road. It would damage protected roadless areas and streams and harm endangered wolverine and bull trout. Perpetua Resources must not construct the road before the courts have decided whether the project is allowable. That damage can’t be undone once it happens.”
###
Save the South Fork Salmon strives to protect and preserve the ecological, cultural, and economic resources of the South Fork of the Salmon River watershed and the well-being of the people that depend on them for generations to come.
www.savethesouthforksalmon.com
Idaho Conservation League’s mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.
Advocates for the West is a non-profit, public interest environmental law firm headquartered in Boise, Idaho, that works to defend public lands, water, fish and wildlife throughout the American West.
Idaho Rivers United’s mission is to protect and restore the rivers and fisheries of Idaho, and is the only conservation organization in the state focused exclusively on the health and protection of river resources.
Earthworks mission is to protect communities and the environment against the adverse impacts of mineral and energy development while seeking sustainable solutions.
The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 1.7 million members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.
American Rivers is championing a national effort to protect and restore all rivers, from remote mountain streams to urban waterways.
By now, you’ve likely seen local, regional, western, and national coverage of the Trump administration’s plan to reorganize the Forest Service.
The proposal includes moving the agency’s headquarters from Washington, D.C. to Salt Lake City, eliminating the 9 Regional Offices, establishing 15 new State Offices (including one in Boise), setting up a network of Service Centers, and consolidating 77 Research Centers into as few as 20.
Hundreds of conservation groups and outdoor companies are sounding the alarm, warning that the Forest Service is essentially being dismantled. In response, the Forest Service itself took the unusual step of releasing a “Myth vs. Facts” statement in an attempt to push back on that narrative.
Several retired Forest Service supervisors describe the proposal not as a dismantling but as a “flattening” of what they see as a top and middle management-heavy (muffin-topped) organizational structure. In their view, the changes could ultimately be beneficial—reducing costs, improving efficiency, and helping staff get more work done. The Forest Service Chief also noted that no changes would be made until after this year’s wildfire season.
Still, the massive pushback against the reorganization (“Blink twice if you are being kidnapped, Smokey”) reflects a far deeper concern: many people who value public lands see this as part of a broader pattern—one that could ultimately lead to weakening protections and selling off public lands.
liminating Regional offices and creating State offices
Currently, North Idaho forests are managed out of the Region 1 office in Missoula, Montana, while south Idaho forests are managed out of the Region 4 office in Ogden, Utah. Replacing regional offices with state offices could make sense—if done thoughtfully. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) already uses a state-based structure with reasonable success, but that model depends on adequate staffing and resources.
However, as currently envisioned, the Forest Service State Offices would be staffed by only a handful of employees and would lack the full complement of Regional staff who have special expertise in mine engineering, forest pathogens, cultural resources, and Treaty Rights, and more. While the newly proposed Service Centers could house some of these experts, that is not stated in the current plan. The result could be further loss of institutional knowledge when we can least afford it.
The importance of a Washington presence
While maintaining local District Ranger and Forest Supervisor offices makes sense for working with local communities, the Forest Service leadership also needs to engage directly with members of Congress and other federal agencies in critical matters like budgeting and coordination. Key decisions are made in D.C, not Salt Lake City. A reduced presence there could leave the Forest Service at a distinct disadvantage. As the saying goes, “If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu.” A diminished Washington office might lead to reduced funding, staffing, and ability to keep the Forest Service intact.
Institutional knowledge
One of the biggest risks is the loss of staff with critical institutional knowledge. When the last Trump administration moved the BLM’s headquarters from Washington, D.C. to Grand Junction, Colorado, hundreds of employees retired or left their jobs rather than relocating. These people never came back. The move didn’t result in savings but instead a significant loss of expertise.
We have the same concerns here. To make matters worse, the Forest Service is already dealing with staffing gaps following last year’s senseless, chaotic and illegal DOGE-related cuts. While some staff were hired back, many were not. This reorganization could exacerbate those losses. Furthermore, Congress is not being consulted about this reorganization.
Research at risk
Forest Service research stations collect critical data on watersheds, fisheries, wildlife, forest health, and silviculture, among many other topics. Consolidating or closing these stations raises serious concerns (“It’s just madness”)—especially if long-term study sites and datasets are abandoned in the process. These Stations are essential in generating applied research which is essential for preparing for disasters and guiding restoration. Weakening them now is a step in the wrong direction.
The Ugly
While ICL has questions about the real intent behind the reorganization, the more troubling issues arise over changes in priorities, policy, and by extension, land management—particularly around public review of proposed projects.
The Forest Service argues that this reorganization will move decision-makers closer to the public so the agency can better serve them. However, at the same time, recent changes to NEPA regulations reduce or remove opportunities for the public to learn about and provide input on Forest Service activities. So while decision makers may be geographically closer to you, they are now no longer allowed to host public comment periods for the majority of the projects affecting Idahoans.
This reality is already playing out. Take the Upper Bigwood Vegetation Management Project near Galena in the Sawtooth National Recreation Area for example. This 2,500-acre proposed project—in a landscape that is highly visible, well used, and well loved—would typically be analyzed through an Environmental Assessment (EA) with scoping and comment periods. These public comments provide community members with meaningful opportunities to shape the project,helping to optimize treatment activities and minimize negative impacts. In the past, the Forest Service has made substantive project improvements as a result of public comments. However, under the new regulations and the new Emergency Authorization, this project is proceeding without an official public comment period (there is an open house on May 11). That represents a significant shift away from public participation.
The Forest Service isn’t dead…at least not yet. The Ranger Districts, Forests and Forest Supervisor offices are all still here. The agency even hired seasonal staff for trail work. And citizen-led forest restoration collaboratives like the Boise Forest Coalition continue to connect communities to the Forest Service. But the reform the agency truly needs isn’t the proposed “structural overhaul”—or preparation for disintegration—but a restoration of the funding and adequate staffing to fulfill its mission: “Caring for the Land and Serving the People.”
The recently announced major restructure of the U.S. Forest Service may disrupt a number of forestry positions in Idaho. But the details as to how those positions will be affected and what work will continue or be eliminated under the plan remain unclear.
Anna Webb, an entomologist and federal employee union representative based in Boise, received a notice about two weeks ago that her position in the agency would be affected. The letter said affected employees may have to move, find another position within the federal agency, or resign.
There was no expected timeline to the changes.
“It makes things difficult to plan,” Webb said, speaking to the Idaho Capital Sun in her capacity as a union representative. “It causes unprecedented amounts of stress.”
Leaders of the federal employee union that represents Forest Service employees for the Boise, Payette, Salmon-Challis and Sawtooth national forests are concerned about the disruption to local employees as well as the potential long-term consequences to forest health. READ MORE: 2026-04-22 USFS Restructure
Snow surveys taking place across the American west this week are offering a grim prognosis, after a historically warm winter and searing March temperatures left the critical snowpack at record-low levels across the region.
Experts warned that even as the heat begins to subside, the stunning pace of melt-off over the past month has left key basins in uncharted territory for the dry seasons ahead. Though there’s still potential for more snow in the forecast, experts said it will probably be too little too late.
“This year is on a whole other level,” said Dr Russ Schumacher, a Colorado State University climatologist, speaking about the intense heat that began rapidly melting the already sparse snowpack in March. “Seeing this year so far below any of the other years we have data for is very concerning.”
Acting as a water savings account of sorts, snowpacks are essential to water supply. Measurements taken across the west during the week of 1 April are viewed as important indicators of the peak amounts of water that might melt into reservoirs, rivers and streams and across thirsty landscapes through the summer. READ MORE
For many travelers, a summer adventure means photographing or traversing some of Mother Nature’s incredible works of art. Unfortunately, many of the iconic National Parks are so crowded that they require reservations in advance. If you’re looking for challenging hikes, excellent fishing, breathtaking canyon views, and epic whitewater without the crowds, consider the spectacular Owyhee Canyonlands, locally known as “The Big Quiet.” This largely untouched area covers nearly 9 million acres of Eastern Oregon, Southwestern Idaho, and Northern Nevada, beckoning visitors with an incredibly diverse range of geologic features, desert life, and adventurous experiences.
As the Owyhee Canyonlands stretch for hundreds of miles, there are several points of entry. The closest major metropolitan area with an airport is Boise. If you’re flying in, you’ll need to rent a 4×4 with high ground clearance and drive nearly 90 minutes to get to the edge of the wilderness area. Double-check that your rental car agreement permits off-road driving, or consider a specialty company such as Ribik. READ MORE
Walt Dabney, former National Park Service Superintendent and Texas State Park Director, discusses the history and future of America’s public lands. This presentation was filmed at a guide and outfitters training in Moab, Utah. CNHA has supported the parks and public lands of southeastern Utah since 1967. Sales from our retail outlets & online store, memberships and donations support the education and research efforts of our public land partners: The National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management and USDA Forest Service.
The Camp Fire that started it all
BCHA Founders
BCHA, Who we Are and How to Help
There is a lot of confusion about the chainsaw protection standards and how they vary around the world.
Type C, Class 1, chainsaw fabric layers, chainspeed, test methods ….
Understanding the global chainsaw protection standards is becoming increasingly important as arborists explore work opportunities in different countries and as arborist retailers start shipping outside their home country.
We thought that it was time to put a comprehensive guide to chainsaw protection standards together. Grab your popcorn and read on.
The Two Main Global Chainsaw Protection Standards
Broadly speaking, all of the current global standards for chainsaw protective legwear can be classified under two headings: European and North American.
- European: currently this is ISO 11393, published in 2018, which replaced EN381
- North American: The USA standard,ASTM F1897, is the main document for North America so will be referred to in this paper.
The standards under either of these headings specify the general requirements for design and construction, the protective coverage areas, the performance testing needed, the certification process and the labelling and marking information required.
The Australian/New Zealand standard, AS/NZS 4453 and the Japanese standard JIS T 8125: 2022 are virtually direct copies of ISO 11393, so for the purposes of this paper these will be grouped under the European heading.
The Canadian standard, ASTM F3325, is very similar to ASTM F1897 so comes under the North American heading READ MORE
Your chainsaw safety gear is important. Really important. Continuing cases of chainsaw injuries show that there is a real need to educate chainsaw operators on the correct selection and use of chainsaw safety gear.
This guide examines the different styles and options of chainsaw PPE available to the user and how to choose the best chainsaw protection for your unique situation.
There are two main types of chainsaw safety apparel, chainsaw trousers or chainsaw chaps. Both have the special fabric permanently sewn into the garment. Within each of these styles of garment there are variations designed to meet the differing needs encountered by those who use a chainsaw.
When deciding which style and which product is best suited for your needs there are a number of factors to consider:
1. How often you use the chainsaw
2. The type of work you are doing
3. The environment you are working in
4. The quality/durability you desire
5. The standards and/or regulations governing the work you are doing
6. You/your company’s budget and safety culture
Factor 1: How often you use the chainsaw
If you are using a chainsaw frequently as part of your normal daily work, you should consider wearing chainsaw pants rather than chaps. In general, pants will be lighter overall than chaps worn over a pair of standard jeans. Chainsaw trousers will be more comfortable and there are no straps that can get snagged on branches or machinery.
Think about the time taken to put chaps on and off during a day, whereas with trousers you always have your chainsaw protection with you.
From a company’s perspective, if the staff are all wearing chainsaw trousers, you will have peace of mind knowing that good safety practices are being followed. With chaps, it is all too easy to avoid the hassle of putting them on just to perform a small cutting job.
Modern chainsaw trousers are made using technical fabrics and complex designs for a better fit and higher level of comfort. READ MORE
Back Country Horsemen of Idaho hosted a booth at the Idaho Sportsman Show March 5-6 that informed the public about all the various volunteer groups that do trail work on public lands as part of their charter. Members from BCHI, ITA, SBFC, TVTMA, Boise Ridge Riders, CC-ATV, Emmett Rough Riders and Idaho ATV manned the booth during the show and handed out information about both motorized and non-motorized group that might be of interest to the show attendee’s. They also told the public what their specific group does on public lands and how to get involved. The general feeling was the booth was very successful and these groups have committed to supporting a “Trails” booth in 2027/
Trump’s Pick to Lead National Parks? An Executive Who Manages Private Hotels Within National Parks
The White House announced a new director of the National Park Service (NPS) last week — and parks advocacy groups are not happy about the choice.
Hospitality executive Scott Socha is President Trump’s pick to lead the NPS, according to a list of new federal appointments announced on Feb. 11. Unlike many past directors of the NPS, Socha has no apparent experience in public service or conservation.
Moreover, Socha’s company, Delaware North, specializes in hotels and resorts, many of which are located within national parks. Delaware North has even successfully sued the NPS over the ownership of iconic names, including “Yosemite National Park.”
The Senate must still confirm the nomination of Socha, who is “totally qualified” to implement Trump’s plans for the parks, a White House spokesperson told GearJunkie on Tuesday. “Scott looks forward to implementing America First initiatives, such as increasing park access for American families, reducing permitting burdens, and raising money for conservation projects,” spokesperson Taylor Rogers said.
However, parks groups point out that Trump’s plans for the park service have also included a proposed $900 million cut, which parks organizations have said would shutter hundreds of NPS sites around the country.