{"id":11688,"date":"2026-03-19T09:41:19","date_gmt":"2026-03-19T15:41:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/?p=11688"},"modified":"2026-03-19T09:41:19","modified_gmt":"2026-03-19T15:41:19","slug":"public-lands-stibnite-gold-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/?p=11688","title":{"rendered":"Public Lands &#8211; Stibnite Gold Project"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Screenshot-2026-03-19-093729.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-11689\" src=\"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Screenshot-2026-03-19-093729-1024x256.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"630\" height=\"158\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Screenshot-2026-03-19-093729-1024x256.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/sbbch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Screenshot-2026-03-19-093729-300x75.jpg 300w, https:\/\/sbbch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Screenshot-2026-03-19-093729-768x192.jpg 768w, https:\/\/sbbch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Screenshot-2026-03-19-093729.jpg 1514w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 630px) 100vw, 630px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"\">For more than a decade, Perpetua Resources\u2014the junior gold mining company behind the controversial <a href=\"https:\/\/perpetuaresources.com\/project\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Stibnite Gold Project<\/a>\u2014has peddled a shifting set of narratives to \u201csell\u201d their project to Idahoans, investors, and the U.S. Government. As Perpetua moves toward a final investment decision on the project, it\u2019s worth examining how well those narratives have really held up.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\">The original narrative Perpetua put forth was that their massive new mine was counterintuitively necessary to clean up historic mining issues at the site. However, the U.S. Forest Service concluded in <a href=\"https:\/\/usfs-public.app.box.com\/v\/PinyonPublic\/file\/1741117187661\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">their Final Record of Decision<\/a> that taking no action at all to address the existing contamination at the site would be <em>less<\/em> harmful to the environment than proceeding with the Stibnite Gold Project, even assuming that the company\u2019s mining and proposed cleanup work goes perfectly according to plan (which never happens). Perpetua also inaccurately claimed that restoration was only possible through the proposed mine; the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nezperce.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Whitepaper_NPT-interests-and-activities-in-and-around-the-Stibnite-gold-project-area_Final.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Nez Perce Tribe<\/a> in particular has invested millions of dollars to restore the surrounding watershed and clean up contamination from earlier mining operations at Stibnite.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\">Perpetua\u2019s second narrative was that the antimony mined at Stibnite would help advance a broader transition to clean energy by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.investors.perpetuaresources.com\/investors\/news\/2021\/perpetua-announces-antimony-supply-agreement-for-ambri-battery-production\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">supplying a key ingredient for a new type of liquid-metal battery<\/a>. However, the company designing those batteries (Ambri) filed for bankruptcy in 2024, and you\u2019d be hard pressed to hear Perpetua make any mention of clean energy since President Trump\u2019s reelection.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\">More recently, Perpetua has leaned heavily on a third\u2014and more politically potent\u2014narrative: that the Stibnite Mine is essential to U.S. national security because it would provide antimony for military uses. At first glance, this claim is compelling. Antimony is used in a range of military applications, and reducing reliance on foreign supply chains for our national defense is a worthwhile goal. But a closer look reveals this argument for what it is: a convenient facade.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\">In a recent appearance on the mining investor podcast <a href=\"https:\/\/podcasts.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/jon-cherry-balancing-gold-economics-national-defense\/id1418050443?i=1000737771140\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Mining Stock Daily<\/em><\/a>, Perpetua CEO Jon Cherry said the quiet part out loud: &#8220;<em>Antimony is the enabler because of the government\u2019s support. The economics are driven all by the gold. Our mine plan is based on gold.<\/em>\u201d The message could not be more clear: Stibnite is not about antimony, it\u2019s about the gold (and it always was).<\/p>\n<p class=\"\">Even on its own terms, the antimony narrative is full of holes. Perpetua has acknowledged that a mere <a href=\"https:\/\/valleylookout.com\/2025\/12\/09\/a-win-for-idaho-perpetua-idaho-national-laboratory-partner-on-antimony-processing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">10% of Stibnite\u2019s mined antimony ore<\/a> will actually be routed to the military. And as it turns out, Stibnite\u2019s antimony might not actually be high enough grade to meet the military\u2019s standards. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/features\/2025-12-19\/billionaire-john-paulson-gets-a-gold-mine-in-us-s-critical-minerals-rush\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Recent reporting by\u00a0<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/features\/2025-12-19\/billionaire-john-paulson-gets-a-gold-mine-in-us-s-critical-minerals-rush\"><em>Bloomberg<\/em><\/a> highlighted that industry experts and some military officials don\u2019t see Stibnite as the best domestic source of antimony, in part because of the high cost associated with refining their lower grade ore. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.war.gov\/News\/Releases\/Release\/Article\/4319016\/department-of-war-awards-434-million-to-further-on-shore-antimony-trisulfide-pr\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Multiple projects<\/a> being pursued elsewhere in the West contain notably higher grade antimony than Stibnite.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\">Perpetua\u2019s evolving narratives to justify this mine have proved to be misleading at best and downright false at worst. Strip away the mining company rhetoric and what remains is an irresponsible, taxpayer-subsidized open-pit gold mine designed primarily to maximize returns for wealthy shareholders. Perpetua will essentially be using $80 million of government subsidies intended to support antimony production to take $18 billion worth of gold out of the ground. And unlike oil and gas companies that must pay a royalty back to the public for the resources they extract from public lands, Perpetua would pay no such royalties to exploit our public lands thanks to the antiquated Mining Law of 1872.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\">We need some mines in some places for some reasons. But a massive open-pit gold mine in the headwaters of the South Fork Salmon River\u2014one of Idaho\u2019s most ecologically important watersheds\u2014simply to line investor pockets and stockpile gold bars in faraway vaults? No thanks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For more than a decade, Perpetua Resources\u2014the junior gold mining company behind the controversial Stibnite Gold Project\u2014has peddled a shifting set of narratives to \u201csell\u201d their project to Idahoans, investors, and the U.S. Government. As Perpetua moves toward a final investment decision on the project, it\u2019s worth examining how well those narratives have really held [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11688","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-current-events","category-public-lands"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11688","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11688"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11688\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11690,"href":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11688\/revisions\/11690"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sbbch.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}